On 9/20/07, Richard Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20/09/2007, Nikolai Weibull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's exactly what you want for these kinds of projects. An easy way > > to get your own working copy, patch it up, and then send out patches. > > You thus avoid having to do any kind of problematic user management, > > which none of the above alternatives can provide. > Well, SVK is readily available and GIT can act as a SVN client, whereas > you can not use SVN as a GIT client. That's not a good reason to use SVK. If that's the case, then we should all be using SCCS, as every SCM can be used as a SCCS client. SVK is a crutch on (SVN, which is) a crutch (on CVS). nikolai --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
