Posted by Todd Zywicki:
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE CRISIS:

   Interesting [1]article in today's Washington Post on the medical
   malpractice insurance crisis. It is one of the more in-depth news
   analyses I have seen on the whole issue.
   I am especially intrigued by a chart that accompanies it that shows
   the median settlements and jury verdicts in malpractice cases.
   Unfortunately, it appears that the on-line story does not contain the
   chart (or at least I didn't see it). But it is interesting because it
   shows a very wide range between DC, VA, and MD on both settlements and
   jury verdicts. Most interesting is that MD has by far the lowest
   average settlements (only about $17k according to the chart) it has by
   far the highest median jury awards ($761k). By contrast for DC the
   figures are $170k versus $465k, and for VA $305k versus $670k. I can't
   think of any reason why MD's settlements are so low relative to its
   jury awards--I would have predicted that high jury awards would tend
   to generate higher settlements as well (a pattern which seems to hold
   in DC and VA).
   Not coincidentally, [2]Jeffrey Birnbaum has an article on the same
   page of the Post noting that business interests are increasingly
   tilting towards supporting Republicans. He describes in particular the
   effect that the naming of John Edwards as VP candidate has had on
   galvanizing the Chamber of Commerce, which traditionally had been
   fairly neutral, but which has been galvanized by concerns over the
   liability system and liability reform issues. According to Birnbaum
   there are also some business 527 groups warming up in the bullpen to
   attack Edwards on the trial lawyer issue, including the [3]Prosperity
   Project. Unfortunately, much of the cool stuff in this article is also
   in a chart that isn't reproduced on the Washington Post web page (at
   least not with the article).
   Amazingly, according to Birnbaum's figures, Microsoft continues to
   support Democrats and Republicans almost equally ($454k to Republicans
   and $404k to Democrats). Which simply raises again the often-remarked
   question of how could a company that is so smart on business matters
   be so dumb when it comes to politics? Do they really want another
   Democratic Attorney General?

References

   1. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64192-2004Sep5.html
   2. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64582-2004Sep5.html
   3. http://www.bipac.org/project/about.asp

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to