Let us suppose that some inventor built an over-unity electric
motor-generator pair. And suppose that the input to the motor was 12
volts DC at 1 amp, and the output from the generator into a resistive
load was say 24 volts DC at 3 amps (ie 6 times over-unity). Wouldn't
you think it a little bit suspicious that those in charge of the
invention never closed the energetic loop by simply feeding some
proportion of the output back to the input!?
But they say, we can't do that because it would run away and
self-destruct. But surely one could think of a solution such as a
centrifugal brake, or a fan (which is also a non-linear load) to keep it
under control. To find the same proponents, years later, still trying
various different methods of separately measuring the output power, and
arguing about how the input power measurement might have been cheated
on, would stretch incredulity to the limit don't you think!
And yet that is exactly what Rossi / Defkalion / Vortex / etc have been
doing for the last few years. What is wrong with everybody!?
The input power is simply heat, and the output power ... why that is
also heat!!! Now why doesn't someone near the action insist that a
proper test would be to simply "feed some of the output back to the
input and let it self-run"!?
Because it will thermally run-away and self-destruct? Of course it will
- as will just about every single internal combustion engine in
existence if you don't provide some means to prevent it by taking the
heat away. But we solved that problem probably a century ago. In the
old days they simply had a passive thermostat that used the expansion of
melting wax to open a valve and allow water to circulate through the
radiator thus keeping the engine temperature under control (and
approximately constant). In modern cars they have an active system - a
temperature sensor measures the temperature and when it is getting too
hot, it cycles a fan and pump on to dump some heat in the radiator and
keep it at an optimal temperature.
Why on earth cannot something simple like this be done with a Rossi
reactor? I would be so easy. Simply fit heat sink fins and a shroud
around the reactor and send a blast of cool air through it. I am sure
that it will be unable to thermally run-away in such a situation. If
the temperature starts dropping below the optimally active value, simply
turn the fan off and let it warm up again. It doesn't take much power
to get something very hot when it is reasonably insulated from
convection currents. An unpowered reactor that stays almost red-hot by
itself while blowing hot air over everyone - now wouldn't that be
impressive and convincing - and so easy if it really is over-unity!
