The melting miracle may put into question some irrefutable logic about reactor melt down.
It is assumed by all what are not judged to be nuts that when the reactor get up to 2000C during meltdown, the nickel particles are long since melted and something else is causing increasing temperature rise beyond the melting point of nickel. But could the “melting miracle” preserve these micro sized nickel particles from any deterioration even if the reactor temperature gets up to 2000C? On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a > mistake that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C > as being 1400C. > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> There was a directly observable miracle that showed unmelted nano >>> structure on the surface of those nickel micro particles that should have >>> melted at 1000C and yet where photographed after days of 1400C reactor >>> operating temperatures. Those temperature differences are TOO LARGE to be >>> due to poor experimental measurement or technique. >>> >> >> Your imagery is vivid, but you've assumed that the experiment actually >> ran at 1400C. This is one of the questions that is up for debate. >> Misdirection is not yet established given what we know. >> >> Eric >> >> >
