This line of reasoning leads me to wonder if the mini explosions that some think are occurring are able to sputter the fuel. In this scenario, the molten mass is continually torn apart into small blobs that then cool into odd shapes and sizes.
Is anything of this nature even remotely possible? This is just an strange thought that came into my visualization. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Oct 18, 2014 5:13 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hotcat melting miracle The melting miracle may put into question some irrefutablelogic about reactor melt down. It is assumed by all what are not judged to be nuts thatwhen the reactor get up to 2000C during meltdown, the nickel particles are longsince melted and something else is causing increasing temperature rise beyondthe melting point of nickel. But could the “melting miracle” preserve thesemicro sized nickel particles from any deterioration even if the reactor temperaturegets up to 2000C? On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a mistake that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C as being 1400C. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: There was a directly observable miracle that showed unmelted nano structure on the surface of those nickel micro particles that should have melted at 1000C and yet where photographed after days of 1400C reactor operating temperatures. Those temperature differences are TOO LARGE to be due to poor experimental measurement or technique. Your imagery is vivid, but you've assumed that the experiment actually ran at 1400C. This is one of the questions that is up for debate. Misdirection is not yet established given what we know. Eric
