Here's a good theory: Maybe the answer is as simple as the E-Cat(product name for the low temperature model) is manufactured in Florida. The HotCat(product name for the high temperature model) has R&D/manufacturing in Raleigh but the inspector didn't ask about the HotCat so Vaughn wasn't forced to volunteer information about it.
This makes sense. Rossi is probably misdirecting everyone because he doesn't want to be stalked in Florida. Vaughn simply told the rep the truth, that Rossi is lying. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:14 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Who has standing to ask? IH is privately held > <http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=245130378> > . > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Someone has to contact JT Vaughn now and find out if he was misquoted. >> Either that or Rossi has gone totally crazy. >> >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Boom! >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Lewan Mats <mats.le...@nyteknik.se> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I contacted David Crowley, Manager of the Radioactive Materials >>>> Branch at N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, and asked a few >>>> questions about the document published by GW. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Here’s his answer: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - - - - - >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Mr. Lewan, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The report posted to www.freeenergyscams.com is in fact a copy of an >>>> original report from my office. Please note that the allegation number >>>> should be labeled 2015-01 instead of 2014-01 because the investigation was >>>> the first one finalized in 2015. Anything stated within the report >>>> findings was in context to an allegation investigation of radioactive >>>> material being utilized in North Carolina. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The investigators documented what was said and observed. They reported >>>> what was communicated to them by Mr. Vaughn, but left out additional >>>> descriptive language that followed the statement of credibility. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We have no further information to share about the alleger. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you for your inquiry. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> David Crowley >>>> >>>> N.C. Department of Health and Human Services >>>> >>>> Manager, Radioactive Materials Branch – Division of Health Service >>>> Regulation >>>> >>>> 5505 Creedmoor Rd, First Floor, Raleigh, NC 27612 >>>> >>>> 1645 MSC, Raleigh NC 27699-1645 >>>> >>>> Phone: 919-814-2303 >>>> >>>> david.crow...@dhhs.nc.gov >>>> >>>> www.ncradiation.net >>>> >>>> www.ncdhhs.gov/dhsr/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - - - - >>>> >>>> Mats >>>> >>>> www.animpossibleinvention.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Från:* Ian Walker [mailto:walker...@gmail.com] >>>> *Skickat:* den 5 februari 2015 19:20 >>>> *Till:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >>>> *Ämne:* Re: [Vo]:Investigation by NC Department of Health into >>>> IH/Rossi/Vaughn/etc >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> As has been noted on Ecatworld in a post by US_Citizen71 >>>> >>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/04/rossi-responds-to-publication-of-inspection-report/ >>>> and as many thought from the disjointed ambiguous and odd phrasing in >>>> the letter as well as missing pages, the letter appears to be a Photoshop >>>> job. >>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxCBtZoq-VqLd1VOd3dVS2pRWGM/view >>>> >>>> Kind Regards walker >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5 February 2015 at 16:03, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have no idea why J. T. Vaughn said what he said, but I expect he >>>> did say it. I do not think he is the sort of person who lies. Perhaps they >>>> are fed up with Rossi? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I do not know who said what to whom, but let's go over this statement >>>> again: >>>> >>>> >>>> "Mr JT Vaughn stated .. that Mr Rossi did not appear credible >>>> (paraphrase)" >>>> >>>> Imagine an inspector from the State of South Carolina were to call me >>>> on the phone and ask: "regarding this fellow Rossi, does he have any >>>> credibility with the scientific mainstream?" I would say "no, he doesn't." >>>> I might add that he has not published anything, he says controversial >>>> things, and he has a checkered past. I think it is obvious to anyone that >>>> he does not appear credible. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I think some of Rossi's claims are probably true. Others I think are >>>> exaggerated or mistaken. He certainly has a credibility problem. I was >>>> hoping the second Elforsk test would settle the issue once and for all but >>>> unfortunately I do not think it has. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> If Vaughn said something like that, I don't see how anyone can >>>> criticize it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Jed >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
