Axil, welcome aboard, it’s been lonely on this limb and you are much more suited than I to reinforce and champion the relativistic theory than I. You added another great insight in this post [snip] LENR seems to separate the vacuum into a positive zone and a negative zone. The positive zone produces the fusion reaction, and the negative zone suppresses the gamma and stabizes the radioactive results of the fusion.[/snip] .. everyone focuses on the cavity and the negative vacuum pressure as the active region but you additionally suggest the larger surrounding geometry [positive vacuum] responsible for the cavity provides gamma screening. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 2:34 AM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit Dear Francis X, I am coming around to your way of thinking. Regarding... “when lasers were fired through the EmDrive’s resonance chamber, some of the beams appeared to travel faster than the speed of light. If that’s true, it would mean that the EmDrive is producing a warp field or bubble. “ The resonant shape of the microwave EmDrive cavity produces a pattern of positive and negative vacuum energy that corresponds to the high and low energy pattern of microwave radiation generated by electromagnetic interference. The zone of increased positive vacuum energy may produce longer lived virtual particles whose lifetime is proportional to the "false" vacuum value characterize by the zone of EMF excited vacuum. But to keep energy conservation of the vacuum constant, a positive zone of vacuum energy must also correspond with and be offset by a negative zone of vacuum energy. The lifetimes of these longer lived virtual particles may be long enough to provide a reaction platform that meets the requirements of Newton’s momentum laws. Furthermore, there could be a connection between the EmDrive and the LENR reaction. That connection could be the partitioning of the vacuum into positive and negative zones. This might mean that the speed of light increases beyond its nominal value in a zone of negative vacuum energy. In a homonginous vacuum, the speed of forward photon propagation is determined by how fast the photon goes from one virtual particle creation event to the next based on the density of virtual particles produced in the vacuum by the averge virtual particle creation rate. In a homogenous vacuum, If the average rate of photon virtual particle interaction is steady, This steady rate of light’s interatcion with the particles of the vacuum will produce a steady average maximum speed of light through the vacuum. In a zone of negative vacuum energy, less virtual particles are produced. This reduces the density of virtual particles encountered by the photon per unit time. Less friction from the vacuum results, thereby increaseing the speed of light through the zone of negitive vacuum energy. Time speeds up when the speed of light in increased. LENR seems to separate the vacuum into a positive zone and a negative zone. The positive zone produces the fusion reaction, and the negative zone suppresses the gamma and stabizes the radioactive results of the fusion. LENR will dramatically increase the decay rate of radioactive isotopes. This might be caused by the entanglement of the nucleus of the radioactive atom with the zone of negitive vacuum energy. The speed of time progression in the radio active atom might be same as the speed of time in the zone of negative vacuum energy. If this reaction is true, the rate of reduction of virtual particle production in the zone of negative vacuum energy might be proportional to the speed up of the rate of radioactive decay produced by LENR. In one experiment, a radioactive isotope with a half-life of 69 years was reduced to 6 microseconds. That is 15 orders of magnitude reduction. Most halflife reductions in LENR are instantaneous. Time could be moving very rapidly in the zone of negative vacuum energy. There looks to be a way to share that increase in the speedup of the rate of time with matter through the entanglement of matter with the zone of negative vacuum...AKA the surface plasmon-polariton soliton I segest this experiment with the EmDrive to verify this theory of time acceleration. Place a gamma emmiting isotope inside an EmDrive enclosure where the microwave interference is descriptive. If the rate of gamma production is reduced and/or the half-life of the isotope is reduced then the effects of negative vacuum energy on time will be verified both in the EmDrive and in LENR. On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>> wrote: We don't know enough to answer the question because we don't know enough about the origin of the force. Even if it is relativistic as Shawyer claims and the spatial area occupied by the device modifies the encompassed inertial frames that breach the isotropy there remains a strong likelihood that an equal and opposite frame is created and the device is only able to directionalize gravity to produce thrust..NOT able to accumulate a buoyancy. IMHO his use of the term thrust is probably correct and that we won't get a bubble from microwaves in a shaped cavity. Fran -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com<mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com>] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:50 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit Hovering does not violate Newton's laws IMHO. Energy and momentum are conserved. Bob Cook ----- Original Message ----- From: <mix...@bigpond.com<mailto:mix...@bigpond.com>> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 6:44 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the Theoretical Limit In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Mon, 11 May 2015 18:58:16 -0400: Hi Frank, [snip] >The video states that m drive obeys Newtow's laws. It has no reaction >mass. It does not obey Newton's laws. That comment was an understatement >bordering on misinformation. > > >Frank Z Which of Newton's laws does it violate? Does a car going down the road doesn't have reaction mass? Does it violate Newton's laws? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
