Terry and Bob I agree. That is reality and you need capital and soup is ready. Your reasoning is perfect for deep pockets, which is what you say. It is not a protection for a sol inventor.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> wrote: > That is only partly right. I am not so good at the different tactics. > However, if it was my patent and my interest was to give my big oil company > (BP,Shell, etc. . ) an advantage I would severely increase the price of > LENR units and then sell licences at a HIGH price. Possibly one needs to be > even more devious but I am sure there are ways around that paragraph. I > have said so before when we had different opinions that the USPTO or any > other arm of the government cannot create rules that will not be abused and > as there are so many different rules it is soon impossible to determine > what is correct and not. > Keep the government to a minimum and make sure that all things that does > not HAVE TO be detrmined in DC (or Sacramento) is decided locally with only > one government office involved. The constitution is totally fogged in at > this state of the game. > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com > lenn...@thornros.com > +1 916 436 1899 > 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 > > “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a > commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I wrote: >> >> >>> Someone who knows a great deal about patents and the U.S. military told >>> me the USPO would not allow that. You cannot use a patent to suppress a >>> technology or prevent it from reaching the market. There are regulations >>> forbidding that. >>> >> >> Not just regulations; it would be a clear violation of the U.S. >> Constitution, article 1, section 8: >> >> "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for >> limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their >> respective Writings and Discoveries." >> >> If the law were used to suppress technology it would not "promote the >> progress of science and useful arts." >> >> - Jed >> >> >
