Jed,
What you say does not add up. You say the information is not from IH.
You say the information is from Rossi. Forgive me for doubting that he
would send you confidential information that can't be published. Do you
mean information from someone on Rossi's team? If so, why say it was
from Rossi?
As for the numbers Rossi gave Lewan I am much encouraged to see 116C as
the output temperature. My concern was that it would be lower
indicating the possibility of very wet steam/liquid water.
If the steam were superheated the measurement of the heat output is very
simple. Hard to imagine an expert would choose instruments that
couldn't do that well.
On 6/5/2016 11:46 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Well I apologize for my assumption. If the only information you
have is from Rossi please give his actual quote(s)
I already told you: I cannot. Why do you keep asking for things that
you know I cannot give? What is the point?
As I said, the actual numbers are the same ones he gave Lewan.
However, in my opinion they are bogus. I agree with I.H. that these
were "flawed measurements" using "unsuitable measuring devices," so
those numbers cannot be right.
I have not seen anything from him to indicate that the plant did
not operate well.
Of course you don't! He says it operates well.
If you have other numbers, what were their source?
I just told you!!! Rossi was the source. I have no other numbers. How
many times do I have to repeat myself?
- Jed
