Eric,
Rossi said on his blog all was well with IH in the early days. He
surely would not say that now.
If the output temperature was 116C and the steam superheated, really all
you would need to calculate the thermal output would be a flow meter for
the water going in, a pressure gauge and a thermocouple to measure the
steam temperature. Very basic, easy to do things. That is neglecting
the heat required to heat the water to boiling, as was agreed as a
conservative measure. Jed says he knows what the instrumentation was.
Perhaps he will describe it.
This is not like Rossi's earlier demos where the output was barely above
100C.
On 6/5/2016 5:08 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
Adrian,
It is entirely possible that IH hired the expert after the test
started. Or maybe they hired him before the test started. Perhaps
all seemed well to us between IH and Rossi. Some who have access to
additional information were aware of difficulties early on. It is
hard to say from the cheap seats what Leonardo and IH were saying to
one another, and what they were saying among themselves.
Eric
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:01 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Eric,
I don't think IH hired the expert until after the test started.
All seemed well between IH and Rossi when the test started.
On 6/5/2016 3:22 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 2:16 PM, a.ashfield
<a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
My new hypothesis is that the expert that IH brought in
(having little expertise themselves) was from academia and
was a believer in Clarke's Law. As he couldn't disprove the
ERV he was desperately looking around for some way to do
that. Hence his insistence on visiting the customer's facility.
The problem precedes this suggestion. The expert would have been
incompetent not to insist on seeing the customer's area.
Eric
