Bob, you asked my first question on this… that silver exclusion is odd.
From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 1:02 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dirac's sea, the EM Drive and Weyl fermions Jones, can you supply a reference or references that show that the Shawer drive doesn't work with silver and stainless steel as you state below? Also, according to Hotson, an epo is massless because of the spinor nature of the degenerate orbits shared between the electron and its positron phase-twin. Positronium is an orbiting electron and positron that are in normal orbits (above degenerate, have not given off the dual 511 keV photons). Positronium has a mass of essentially twice that of the electron. There are no free electrons in the negative Dirac sea - only epos. So a free electron always has mass. Also, in this Weyl fermion discussion of electrons not having mass, is the description that it has no apparent inertial mass? No gravitational mass? Making gravitational mass dissapear would be a neat trick. How can inertial mass disappear without gravitational mass also disappearing? Or are we just talking about a balance of forces? On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: There is a complex web of cross-connections between HTSC (high temperature superconductivity), Weyl fermions, an active aether, copper-oxides, and the RF resonant cavity thruster of Shawyer et al (the EM drive). The cross-connections are ill-defined at present and could be coincidental, but we can take notice of the various links and use that information to steer research. This is especially interesting if we can define an “aether” in such a way that it cannot be discredited. One way is via the theory of Don Hotson. The epo or BEC is based on Dirac’s equation and theories – as is all of Hotson’s “interpretation of Dirac” and this aether-like field consists entirely of massless electrons, possibly now defined as Weyl fermions, in the context of massless positronium. It makes sense to suggest that the Weyl fermion, which has been recently confirmed as real, is indeed an outlier of the same aether-species of Hotson. Since the BEC (as aether) is fully contained throughout another more basic spatial dimension or foundation (which can be “reciprocal space” or 1D) it would not be unexpected to find some of these massless electrons escaping into our 3-Space, and apparently they are coaxed out of the aether dimension via various “semimetals” which are also superconductive oxides. Wheeler’s “quantum foam” may be additional evidence of bleed-over from an epo field into 3-space. The Meissner effect is usually explained as the expulsion of magnetic flux by a superconductor in a magnetic field, but that may be a partial understanding. The phenomenon would be explained differently if we focus on an aether composed of Weyl fermions as Dirac’s sea. This would indicate that Meissner repulsion can become (at least partly) a Coulomb’s Law effect - instead of only inductive. Probably it is a bit of both and possibly this combined effect relates to the tiny thrust of the EM drive, where the cavity asymmetry creates a “wake” of virtual Weyl fermions. A final piece of the puzzle seems to be that only copper works for the frustum of the EM drive, which would naturally have a copper oxide coating. Silver and stainless steel have been tried and don’t work. Copper oxides can become superconductive at high temperature, most often when compounded with other elements. However, there is evidence of that a thin copper oxide coating would have some properties of HTSC on a transitory basis. An interesting detail is the implication that CuO could be a Weyl semimetal and transient HTSC. CuO possibly only works in a very thin layer which explains why some cavities work better than others. It would be most intriguing if transient HTSC can be further linked to the Weyl fermion and to copper oxide and to reactionless thrust. Don Hotson may have posthumously shown us the way.
