see https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3728-Can-we-talk-about-Homlid/?postID=35868#post35868
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:11 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Axil > I don't consider a link to the thread" Can we talk about Homlid?" any sort > of reference what so ever. > Rossi has stated on his blog that not only is he well but, repeatedly, > that the E-Cat does not produce significant radiation. If it had > presumably he would be a sick man by now. > AA > > > On 9/21/2016 5:29 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > See eros posts in > > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/3728- > Can-we-talk-about-Homlid/ > > For Rossi, see his blog. > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:31 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > >> Axil wrote: "Both both Rossi and eros has suffered serious health >> issues when in close contact with their reactors." >> References please >> AA >> >> On 9/20/2016 5:55 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> Rossi now joins the chorus of LENR developers who recognise the dangers >> inherent in high power output LENR reactors. Rossi joins ME356 and eros in >> advising caution based on their observation of LENR performance >> characteristics. Both both Rossi and eros has suffered serious health >> issues when in close contact with their reactors. >> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:08 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Axil, I doubt the QuarkX is that dangerous. It is not like it could >>> cause a nuclear explosion. >>> Rossi seems to think The QuarkX is the future and the real problem is >>> him being tied up in a legal battle. >>> In answer to a comment on anther thread, suggesting that because IH >>> claimed they had tried and failed, consider that MIT and Caltech concluded >>> that Fleischmann & Pons could not be replicated 0 and we now know it can >>> be. >>> I don't see IH giving up without getting their hands on the Quark >>> technology. >>> AA >>> >>> >>> On 9/20/2016 4:40 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >>> >>>> Norman >>>> September 20, 2016 at 7:28 AM >>>> Dear Andrea Rossi: >>>> Update of the work on the QuarkX? >>>> Cheers, >>>> Norman >>>> >>>> Andrea Rossi >>>> September 20, 2016 at 8:29 AM >>>> Norman: >>>> Still in very good standing, but also still dangerous. Working mainly >>>> on safety issues now. >>>> Warm Regards, >>>> A.R. >>>> >>>> If seems that LENR reactors are not as inherently safe as we all once >>>> thought. But the safe deployment of LENR technology could still be >>>> accommodated into the current power infrastructure. >>>> >>>> The development of ocean deployment of huge wind turbines will serve >>>> LENR reactor deployment well. A safe method of LENR deployment will entail >>>> the use of those floating platforms located just off shore. >>>> >>>> The technical feasibility of deepwater floating LENR platforms will not >>>> be questioned, as the long-term survivability of floating structures has >>>> been successfully demonstrated by the marine and offshore oil industries >>>> over many decades. However, the economics that allowed the deployment of >>>> thousands of offshore oil rigs have yet to be demonstrated for floating >>>> LENR reactor platforms. For deepwater wind turbines, a floating structure >>>> will replace pile-driven monopoles or conventional concrete bases that are >>>> commonly used as foundations for shallow water and land-based reactors. The >>>> floating structure must provide enough buoyancy to support the weight of >>>> the reactor as a function of its size and power production rating and to >>>> restrain pitch, roll and heave motions within acceptable limits. >>>> >>>> Since muon shielding is so problematic, distance from any population is >>>> the one dependable risk mitigation method. >>>> >>>> The distance of LENR deployment offshore would be a function of the >>>> range of muon travel before decay and the inverse square law dilution of >>>> muon density together with safe muon exposure limits. >>>> >>>> The floating LENR reactor will be bigger than a sea buoy, but smaller >>>> than a floating wind turbine. Robotize remote controlled maintence could >>>> allow for human free maintenance of the LENR reactor such as refueling. The >>>> activated waste fuel could be dumped into the deep water or dissolved in >>>> acid. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
