Here is the link to the diagram that did not appear in the post above: https://a.disquscdn.com/get?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpages.csam.montclair.edu%2F%7Ekowalski%2Fcf%2F341fig1.jpg&key=y8LKL4Hf4Ud13sQke0JURw&w=600&h=296
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The so called Erzion phenomenon was discovered in a series of > electrolytic experiments marked by unexplained changes in a pool of cooling > water outside of the catalytic cell. After 40 minutes of electrolytic cell > operation, water on the tungsten anode side of the cooling vessel started > losing its transparency. > > https://youtu.be/MymFcb9U1Ck > > Strange that in this experiment showing the production of sulfur, the > activity was at the anode. Could the Erzion actually be muons? > > Water on the stainless steel cathode of the pool of cooling water remained > transparent, at the same 40 C temperature. A sample of bubbly water, > removed from the anode side, was tested for induced gamma radioactivity. No > such radioactivity was found in it; the sample became transparent after 24 > hours. Attempts to reproduce the long-term loss of cooling water > transparency with other electrolytes, and under different electrical > discharge conditions, were not successful. But the effect was highly > reproducible when experimenting with the tungsten-anode electrolytic cell > and the 7 M KF electrolyte containing 50% of heavy water. > > > > That cooling water on the outside of the electrolytic cell's glass reactor > shell at the right side (see Figure 1) is close to the anode while cooling > water on the left side is close to the cathode. The disappearance of > bubbles, after the electrolysis, was very slow (half-life of about 10 hrs). > Attempts to explain the phenomenon in terms of cavitation, and other > ultrasonic effects, were not successful. The only satisfactory explanation > was possible within the framework of the erzion model. Authors believe > that bubbles are produced through the action of neutral Erzions. > > The Erzons phenomenon behavior is consistent with the magnetic based > Exotic Neutral Particle(ENP). To begin with, the glass container is > transparent to the magnetically based ENPs both optically and magnetically. > The LENR reaction that keeps the ENPs viable produce the vapor that forms > the water bubbles. The ENPs become energetically self sufficient in the > water of the cooling pool where the ENPs remain viable for hours. > > If the Erzons phenomenon is produced by magnetically based ENPs, an iron > plate placed just on the outside of the glass wall adjacent to the anode > would prevent the ENPs from exiting the glass electrolytic cell. With the > ENPs blocked from travel, bubble production would be eliminated. > > The Erzons could be some form of exotic hydrogen such as ultra > dense hydrogen or maybe micro ball lightning. The hydrogen bubbles could be > the product of a muon catalyzed reaction with water. > > Whatever is going on at the anode, it looks like it is happening in a > reliable way. Experimenters might find some way to track this mischugenon > process down. I for one would love to read about the detective process that > makes the identification of this mischugenon process down in Russ's blog. > > On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> When LENR really gets going full blast and gigawatts are generated in >>> cars, trains, planes, boats, houses, everywhere in everything, the muon >>> loading will get into the terawatt levels. Muons flowing down the streets >>> will be so thick, you can cut them with a knife. And muons are a bitch to >>> shield against. >>> >> >> Cold fusion has been run at over 100 W for three months, continuously. I >> believe that if there were dangerous levels of muons, as you describe, they >> would have caused harm, and they would have been detected. There is no sign >> of them. People worked with these unshielded cells every day. So I expect >> you are wrong about this. No theorist has said anything about muons being >> produced by cold fusion in any paper I know of, and I know of all the >> papers. I have searched for the term "muon" and found nothing, other than >> the well-known 1989 discussions of muon-catalyzed fusion. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
