So if that was done with cold fusion... IMO failures in experimental sciences are too specific for it to be meaningful.
It might have limited application, but mostly, I don't see it, too often success and failure is just an inch apart. John Berry On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk> wrote: > Excellent article. > > I have found that it is possible to find out some of the failures by going > to conferences and talking with people. For every field there is usually > someone who knows what has been done, and what has worked and what has > not. The problem is that this is very hit and miss and the information is > not very accessible, which is not a good way to do science > > Nigel > On 15/04/2017 22:06, H LV wrote: > > Why Scientists Must Share Their Failures > > We don’t ask people in other professions to do it, but it’s vital for > speeding up progress in crucial areas of research from climate to medicine > and public health > > By Ijad Madisch on April 13, 2017 > > https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/why-scientists-must- > share-their-failures/?WT.mc_id=SA_FB_POLE_BLOG > > >
