David Thomson wrote:
Hi John,
You’re just as guilty as those you accuse. I have presented a fully
quantified alternative physics theory, which predicts exactly what you
claim ought to be possible.
http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf
You believe matter can be created?
http://www.16pi2.com/files/APM-Construction-of-Universe.pdf
You want mathematical proof that the Aether Physics Model is correct?
Theories can only be disproven, not proven, as all on this list should
be well aware. Evidence may support a theory, but can't "prove it
correct" ... and mathematics, alone, can't "prove" anything about
reality. Evidence alone may, on the other hand, prove a theory
incorrect. Any number of examples can't "prove" a theorem, but a single
counterexample can disprove it.
When you say "Aether Physics model", do you mean aether as in
"luminiferous aether", the hypothetical medium in which electromagnetic
waves propagate?
If so, how you do you account for the results of the Michelson-Morley
and Sagnac experiments in your model? These two brought down the
"classical" aether theories, along with the ballistic theory. (Or do
you deny that MMX actually got a null result?)
I asked Grimer how he dealt with the MMX results, and he never replied
... for whatever that's worth. But maybe he just overlooked the post.
