On 3/4/07, David Thomson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John, > Ok, that didn't take long. > I am after skimming (very lightly) the 3 links unsure what experiments your theory is based on. I am also not sure it said anything about how to make a simple device to output free energy or create (so-called) antigravity. > Does it explain the vast majority, or at least a number of the FE and AG devices to numerous to list? > Is your aether largely entrained by matter? Assuming it is how can it be motivated to flow through matter? If it is what effects will occur, will spins be aligned? Will fields (magnetic, electric, spins/torsion) of the matter be carried on the aether. > If the aether is compressed what will happen? (many experiments indicate antigravity results) And how could the aether be compressed? > Is acceleration/deceleration relative to the aether the source of inertia? > Can matters coupling to the aether be changed? > I seriously don't think you have answered any of these questions. > It seems all you do is explain the mundane. Sorry, John, I have been through this a hundred times already and am not interested in your particular attitude. First off, I quantified exactly what it is you already believe, and now you plan to play me into explaining everything to you in detail. Many of your questions above were answered in the paper, A New Foundation for Physics.
I'll take another look but it seemed very abstract and mathematical, not my kind of thing. If there is some way you could answer some of the questions above, the ones with simple yes or no's or simply tell me what page I of which paper I should consult. As I have been investigating aether from a different angle for a decade now (numerous observations of it clearly functioning in various devices) it is quite possible we could have insights that could be valuable to one another and each come out of it with a better understanding. I have a list of Yes/No questions at the bottom if you could please take 1 minute to answer them. We agree that there is a fluid aether which is matter entrained and apparently on some other points too, I have the experimental side, you have the model covered so let's make an effort as we might both come out of it better off. BTW I am aware also of the beta atmosphere theory, did you find it had significant agreement with your model? The paper was written because people had asked me for a synopsis of the
theory. Twenty seven pages was the shortest I could write a basic synopsis. If the synopsis does not interest you, then too bad. Just go on ignoring my work.
Well if your work doesn't simply explain the mundane but give real experimental 'how to' with regard to Antigravity and Free Energy then I am very interested, does it? I have a book that goes into much more detail, but I don't want to next be
accused of trying to sell books. This theory is far more developed than you can pick up by speed-reading a twenty seven page paper, which is itself just an introductory paper. It would be just as unfair for me to judge modern physics based upon a speed-read of a high school general science book. I'm already into the design and construction phase of various related experiments and being invited to speak before qualified scientists. I make myself available to seriously interested persons, but I don't do the "poodle jumping through the flaming hoop act" anymore. If you are not seriously interested in studying the Aether Physics Model, then it is you who can remain with the mundane and insane physics you so despise.
I am seriously interested but I'm going to have a hard time getting anything practical out of your paper it would seem, it appears to be written to convince academics but I'll give it another shot, still I'd love the crib notes version or simply the answers to the questions I asked, here is a list of yes/no questions that shouldn't take to long, ones you have already answered are omitted: Does it explain the vast majority, or at least a number of the FE and AG devices to numerous to list? Y/N Can the aether be motivated to flow through matter by: Being entrained by moving magnetic field? Y/N Being entrained by moving electric fields? Y/N Does anything special happen if aether flows at 90 dgrees to other aether flows? Y/N If it is made to move through matter will spins be aligned? Y/N Will fields (magnetic, electric, spins/torsion) of the matter be carried on the aether? Y/N Can the aether be compressed? Y/N If the aether is compressed in an object will an antigravity type force or a reduction in weight result? Y/N Is acceleration/deceleration relative to the matter entrained aether the source of inertia? Y/N Can matters coupling to the aether be varied for instance by having a capacitor charged or uncharged? Y/N If aether is made to move through matter in an accelerating manner (perhaps as a beam shot out of a device) would a gravity like impulse be felt? Y/N (Morton, Podkletnov, ATGroup device the name of which alludes me among others, see also 90 degree effect for how they created the impulse) Would a non rotating ring act as a gyroscope if the aether was made to move through the ring in a circular manner? Y/N (as experience by Steve Mark's where a gyroscopic force of precession is noticed if the axis it turned) BTW the only one that I am unsure about personally if the issue of spins being aligned, however there is evidence so that also tells you some of what I have discovered. Ok, off to read just the first paper again but somehow I think it will answer little of the above so your answers would be greatly appreciated.
