Hi John, > I have a list of Yes/No questions at the bottom if you could please take 1 minute to answer them.
> We agree that there is a fluid aether which is matter entrained and apparently on some other points too, I have the experimental side, you have the model covered so let's make an effort as we might both come out of it better off. I will listen to any experiment that has been performed, and examine the data. > BTW I am aware also of the beta atmosphere theory, did you find it had significant agreement with your model? I don't believe I am aware of the Beta Atmosphere theory. Where can I read about it? > Well if your work doesn't simply explain the mundane but give real experimental 'how to' with regard to Antigravity and Free Energy then I am very interested, does it? Yes, I explain briefly in my book how lithium, tritium, deuterium, and a specific list of other isotopes can be used to produce free energy by causing resonance within these particular atoms. I also show the precise working of the Casimir effect and how it can be tapped to produce unlimited energy (just as the Universe already does). Both of the above processes are actually identical, except the first applies to the physics of the proton and the second applies to the physics of the electron. > I am seriously interested but I'm going to have a hard time getting anything practical out of your paper it would seem, it appears to be written to convince academics but I'll give it another shot, still I'd love the crib notes version or simply the answers to the questions I asked, here is a list of yes/no questions that shouldn't take to long, ones you have already answered are omitted: The theory I am presenting is not a philosophy, channeled material, or something I deciphered off a crashed UFO. This is real physics, based upon real (simple algebra) math. It is a fact of science that if you want to understand it, you have to learn it. There is nothing difficult about the Aether Physics Model. All you need to do is take it one step at a time. If you want, I could provide a simple course of the theory based upon A New Foundation for Physics, as a series of lectures. You could ask relevant questions about the material with each posting. > Does it explain the vast majority, or at least a number of the FE and AG devices to numerous to list? Y/N Yes, it explains all the devices. Every one of them has to do with resonance and the Casimir effect. This is easy to see when you understand the basics of the theory. > Can the aether be motivated to flow through matter by: > Being entrained by moving magnetic field? Y/N > Being entrained by moving electric fields? Y/N Yes to both. I actually have a project lined up to do this with magnetic fields. It can also be done with gravitational fields, and in fact, nature does it all the time. All three force fields (electrostatic, electromagnetic, and gravitational) share the same quantum unit. This is why "antigravity" effects can be produced through electrostatic or electromagnetic processes. > Does anything special happen if aether flows at 90 dgrees to other aether flows? Y/N Aether would normally flow as a vortex (hence my interest in this list). I have not considered the situation of 90* Aether flows, per se. > If it is made to move through matter will spins be aligned? Y/N It depends on how the Aether is manipulated. But yes, spins are entirely dependent upon the Aether. The Aether is the source of all subatomic spin. The spin aligned Aether is no different from the electric or magnetic field. Magnetic fields (spin aligned Aether) will tend to align the spins of matter, and matter will tend to align the spins of Aether. Matter, being bound by the strong force (which is the same as the electromagnetic force) and encapsulated by Aether, is in a tug of war with empty spin aligned Aether units in the immediate environment. I could go into much more detail on this. > Will fields (magnetic, electric, spins/torsion) of the matter be carried on the aether? Y/N That is the only place they exist. Each subatomic particle is encapsulated by an Aether unit. The Aether unit is what gives the subatomic particle its electrostatic charge. The angular momentum of the dark matter, which is encapsulated by Aether and thus becomes visible matter, interacts with the conductance of the Aether and produces strong charge (electromagnetic charge). All charge transactions take place in the Aether, there is no other way to do it. > Can the aether be compressed? Y/N The Aether can be compressed and decompressed (stretched) by a factor of two either way. When matter causes compression by a factor of two, the surrounding Aether fabric is stretched by a factor of two. At exactly two, the Aether encapsulated by the matter rips apart from the immediate Aether fabric and implodes. The implosion causes the encapsulated angular momentum to release as dark matter (neutrinos) and the charges associated with the Aether rejoin to return to a state of unity, thus ending the Aether's existence. Modern physics calls this a black hole. However, the black hole does not exist for long periods of time as modern physics suggests, but completely evaporates within seconds or minutes. > If the aether is compressed in an object will an antigravity type force or a reduction in weight result? Y/N Not necessarily. The so-called weight reduction occurs when a bubble of Aether is dissociated from the surrounding Aether fabric. It is like a soap bubble cutting off a region of air from the surrounding atmosphere. The flying triangles likely use this technology. I am building a power supply for a flying triangle. The first step is to build Tesla's Wardencliffe system in miniature, which I have finished building and am now tuning. The Wardencliffe style power supply is a perfectly tuned Tesla coil with the secondary and primary capacitor grounded to an uncoupled extra coil. The extra coil is build to be as perfect a Helmholtz resonator as possible, except instead of resonating air molecules it is resonating electrons. The flying triangle has three such extra coils mounted on a vehicle in which the entire skin is the ground connection. When the system is put into resonance, it creates an Aether bubble around the vehicle. By changing the impedance in each of the extra coil ground connections the bubble can be made to maneuver through the surrounding Aether. Since the space-time (Aether) inside the bubble is no longer connected to the surrounding environment, there is no gravitational force between the Earth and the vehicle. The vehicle is essentially weightless and easy to maneuver. > Is acceleration/deceleration relative to the matter entrained aether the source of inertia? Y/N Inertia is simply the dimension of mass. It is a property that preexists physical existence (just as is length, quantum frequency [time], and charge), therefore these dimensions cannot be understood in terms of physics. To expect inertia to be understood in terms of physics would be like expecting red blood cells to be understood in terms of humans. The red blood cells make up humans, humans don't make up red blood cells. Similarly, dimensions make physical existence, physical existence does not make dimensions. Acceleration, deceleration, and matter are properties of physical existence, not dimensions. > Can matters coupling to the aether be varied for instance by having a capacitor charged or uncharged? Y/N Yes and no. Matter's coupling to the Aether can be altered in a nuclear binding (among protons and neutrons), which explains the "mass deficit" observation. However, with regard to capacitors and electrons on them, the effect governing it is the Casimir effect. By charging and discharging capacitors we can create new photons (not virtual photons, but real photons). The photons are created when a new Aether unit is created, which absorbs dark matter. The photon can then be absorbed by the capacitor plate and converted to an electron via the photoelectric effect. If a load is placed between the plates, the electrons can be put to work, thus making room for more new photons and electrons. We see this occurring all the time in vacuum tubes, solar corona, nebulae, auroras, and many other instances. These new photons and Aether units are the reason why the Universe appears to be expanding. All the new matter is created mostly on the outside of galaxies, while all the old matter implodes at the center of galaxies. It is like a bathtub with the faucet on while the plug is pulled, which causes the galaxies to spin inward toward black holes, and away from each other (Hubble constant). > If aether is made to move through matter in an accelerating manner (perhaps as a beam shot out of a device) would a gravity like impulse be felt? Y/N (Morton, Podkletnov, ATGroup device the name of which alludes me among others, see also 90 degree effect for how they created the impulse) I don't know, but it is easier to find out than you presently imagine. You are familiar with the tornado in a can? We can build the same thing using magnetic fields rather than air molecules. I'm presently building a power supply for this device. Then I will build the rotating magnetic field generator, which will create a magnetic field tornado in a can. > Would a non rotating ring act as a gyroscope if the aether was made to move through the ring in a circular manner? Y/N (as experience by Steve Mark's where a gyroscopic force of precession is noticed if the axis it turned) If the Aether is moving in a circular manner then you have a rotating magnetic field. This is an interesting proposal, which I have not thought of, but will now consider. > BTW the only one that I am unsure about personally if the issue of spins being aligned, however there is evidence so that also tells you some of what I have discovered. The Aether is a two spin, five-dimensional, quantum rotating magnetic field. If the Aether units are aligned to produce a magnetic field, then the spins are automatically aligned. Probably the only example of a perfectly aligned matter/Aether structure is a dense neutron star just on the verge of collapsing. > Ok, off to read just the first paper again but somehow I think it will answer little of the above so your answers would be greatly appreciated. You treat me with respect, I'll treat you to some really great physics. Dave
