Ah Michel > Selecting, at the other extreme, one particle per shot will yield, after a proportionately larger number of shots, the very same fringe pattern, and that's what actually happens in experiments.
Yes. But you did not go far enough, if I catch your mildly dismissive drift- that is, in relating all of this to Chaos theory and then to emergent behavior ... since there is often a preferred "pattern" (the "information field" or "attractor" or "residual") which can emerge from the near random compilation of fringe overlaps ... The butterfly effect and the Lorentz attractor are the science which is behind Gleick's popularization of Prigogine et al. and of the self-relective emergence of science-based ID, instead of ... ? ... atheism ? ... or the other extreme: dogma running over karma ;-) Jones
