Esa, 

Nice citations and interpretations!  I posted some comments inline but was 
disappointed your thread ended so soon. Can you expand any further?

Very Best Regards!

Fran

 

From: Esa Ruoho [mailto:esaru...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 7:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:from vakuumenergie.de

 


http://www.vakuumenergie.de/vacuum/vacuumenergy.html

How vacuum energy and electric systems are related to each other
Matter and space-time (quantum vacuum) are phenomena, which have a close 
relationship. Since matter tells space-time how to curve and space-time tells 
matter how to move, it is obvious that so called material things are rather a 
condition of space-time instead of phenomena, which are disconnected from each 
other. In modern physics not only a so called force field in space is 
considered as a function of the quantum-vacuum, but also the composition of an 
atom merely consists of quantum fluctuations. Mass is not an isolated “thing” 
but a quality of space-time itself. {agreed = wave structure of matter or at a 
minimum wave-particle duality}
If space-time determines how an atom will move, then space-time must contain a 
form of energy.
A known method to extract energy from seemingly empty space-time is the Casimir 
effect. The Casimir experiment consists of two smooth plates which are 
positioned close to each other. Just before they touch, an attracting force 
emerges. The force occurs due to a difference of the quantum-vacuum energy 
densities between and around the plates.
In the absence of atoms and fields the geometry of space-time is nearly 
perfectly symmetrical. If there are two plates in space-time, the plates will 
break the symmetry in a small way. The broken symmetry will integrate a part of 
the energy from the quantum-vacuum into our observable reality. This is what we 
perceive as the so-called vacuum energy!

{Small but still far larger than the vacuum flux imbalance associated with 
particle pair production, “according to Einstein’s space-time concepts, time is 
dilated or always "moves" slower in volumes that contain a different energy 
content than the ones from which they are observed.” The Imagineer's 
<http://www.theimagineershome.com/blog/>  Chronicles. This time dilation 
between different energy levels of vacuum fluctuations is normally 
inconsequential and the field average isotropic at our scale except for the 
slow gradient of a gravitational well. The Casimir cavity however is thought to 
break this isotropy in a paper by Zofia Bialynicka-Birula "Cavity QED" 
http://th-www.if.uj.edu.pl/acta/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf. The idea that longer 
fluctuations are displaced in favor of shorter wavelengths that fit a whole 
number of times between the narrow plates is replaced with a longer wavelength 
that instead is time dilated to appear faster so that it fits between the 
plates.



 “As we have seen the uncertainty principle of the quantum theory shows, that 
fields even within empty space-time are exposed to permanent ongoing quantum 
fluctuations and possess an unlimited energy density. So we have to subtract an 
unlimited value to receive a limited energy density. This is what we see in our 
universe”. (Mathematician und Physicist Prof. Stephen Hawking, The Universe in 
a Nutshell, German version)
If a physical quantity can be measured, then it is called an observable. The 
vacuum energy is a non-observable. So the vacuum energy exists only in a 
virtual or potential form. This potential represents a preliminary stage of an 
observable or usable energy. The quantum-vacuum is pure potential. The 
potential can be transformed into observable energy. Asymmetry means that 
something virtual is being converted into something observable, i.e. potential 
into real energy.
„Since non observables imply symmetry, any discovery of asymmetry must imply 
some observable“ (Physicist Prof. T. D. Lee, Nobel Prize in Phys. 1957. 
Symmetries, Asymmetries and the World of Particles)
One possibility to extract substantial amounts of energy from the 
quantum-vacuum is to break the symmetry by active means. Such a forced 
asymmetry is e.g. constituted by an electric field.
“The asymmetry between opposite signs of electric charge is sometimes called 
particle - antiparticle asymmetry”. (Physicist Prof. T. D. Lee, Nobel Prize in 
Physics 1957. Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood New 
York, 1981)
“The existence of the positive charge, in some sense, distorts, or creates a 
‘condition’ in space, so that when we put the negative charge in, it feels a 
force. This potentiality for producing a force is called an electric field” 
(Physicist Prof. Feynman, Nobel Prize in Physics 1965, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 
MA, 1964, Vol. 1, p. 2-4)
The electromagnetic interaction is transmitted by virtual photons. Virtual 
photons permanently emerge and disappear in the quantum-vacuum.
„The exchanged Photon which has carried and caused the classic electromagnetic 
force is in reality a virtual photon.“ (Physicist Prof. Lisa Randall, Harvard 
University, - Warped Passages. Unraveling the Mysteries of the Universe ́s 
Hidden Dimensions- Nov. 2006, German version)
An electric field is a with light velocity propagating polarization of locally 
appearing virtual photons. Some of the virtual photons decay into virtual 
particle pairs with opposite electric charge. By polarization we mean the 
orientation of the charged virtual particle pairs.
“The meaning of quantum fluctuations is that even empty space-time is filled 
with virtual particle pairs. These virtual particle pairs emerge from 
space-time, then the two charges move a little bit from each other and then 
again come together. After that they annihilate each other. One partner of the 
virtual particle pair has positive energy the other partner has negative 
energy” (Mathematician und Physicist Prof. Stephen Hawking, The Universe in a 
Nutshell, German version)
An electric field is a phenomenon of the quantum-vacuum. So the energy within 
the quantum- vacuum plays a fundamental role within every electric system. This 
fact is normally not obvious because the electric input energy, which is e.g. 
used to drive an ideal electric motor, is usually equal to the mechanical 
output energy. Thus it appears as if the electric energy is being directly 
converted into mechanical energy. That which enters at the entrance comes out 
at the exit.
But this is not the case!
The electric input energy is initially “lost” into the quantum-vacuum in an 
observable sense. It now exists in a potential form. This potential spreads 
with light speed into space. Subsequently, with the help of this potential 
observable (mechanical) energy is integrated from the local quantum-vacuum at 
the output. The reason why (in the case of an ideal system) the observable 
input and observable output energy are equal is provided by something what the 
author has called “The self-symmetrizing mechanism in electromagnetic systems”. 
The self-symmetrizing mechanism enforces the conservation of the observable 
energies involved. The author is convinced that the self-symmetrizing mechanism 
also exists in other interactions.
The first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) now receives a new 
meaning. The energy in the quantum-vacuum must be considered. Therefore 
electromagnetic systems are energetically open systems. They only appear like 
energetically closed systems because their energetic exchange with the 
quantum-vacuum is energy-symmetric. If we want to realize an asymmetric 
electromagnetic system with a coefficient of performance of higher than 100 %, 
then the self-symmetrizing mechanism has to be bypassed.

{Agreed and I am hoping you will elaborate on an electrical embodiment of such 
a scheme. I see already a relativistic scheme in the “abrupt equivalence 
boundary” of a Casimir cavity. A Casimir cavity represents a common solid 
foundation where you have a constant equivalence stream outside the cavity and 
streams of lower velocity inversely prop to Casimir geometry inside. The 
foundation forces the gas atoms inside and outside the cavity to remain 
essentially stationary in 3D while the difference in acceleration rates forces 
their inertial frames to diverge at an accumulating rate (I guess I can’t say 
velocity since that implies distance).}


A static electric charge implies the presence of a dynamic energy flow which is 
related to the vacuum energy. Due to this fact electric systems extract usable 
energy from the quantum vacuum. 
http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Fact_Sheets/Fact%20Sheet%20- 
%20Source%20Charge%20Problem10.doc
The Casimir effect. It detects the presence of the vacuum energy by a 
measurable force between parallel plates. Phys. Rev. A 78, 062111 (2008)
To extract usable energy by the Casimir effect it is necessary to add special 
conditions, see e.g. the “Tunable Casimir Effect“: E. Davis et al., “Review of 
Experimental Concepts for Studying the Quantum Vacuum Field” (Space Technology 
& Applications Int. Forum 2006, 3rd Symposium on New Frontiers & Future 
Concepts, Albuquerque), p. 8 and 19 – 25: 
http://www.earthtech.org/reports/Davis_STAIF_Rev.Exper.Quant.Vac.Field.pdf
Dr. Harold Puthoff has pointed out that it is possible to extract energy and 
heat from the vacuum. Phys. Rev. E, 48, 1562 (1993): 
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRE/v48/i2/p1562_1 Phys. Rev. A 40, 4857 (1989): 
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v40/i9/p4857_1
The Hughes Laboratory has pointed out that it is possible to extract electrical 
energy from the vacuum by cohesion of charged foliated conductors. Phys. Rev. 
B, 30(4), 1700, (1984): http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v30/i4/p1700_1
Prof. Dr. C. W. Turtur ́s direct conversion of vacuum energy into mechanical 
energy.
http://philica.com/display_article.php?article_id=155
Concerning new energy technologies the former NASA astronaut and physicist 
Prof. Brian O ́Leary has pointed out to the significance of the extraction of 
usable energy from the quantum vacuum. See his open letters to Al Gore and 
Barack Obama. http://www.newenergymovement.org/olearygore.php
http://www.brianoleary.info/
Marcus Reid, November 2009

Reply via email to