2010/3/14 Steven Krivit <stev...@newenergytimes.com>: > At 02:35 AM 3/14/2010, you wrote: > > Interesting, but why would Focardi discredit his own work? > > I don't think he would want to.
Then it can't be a Ni-H research discrediting operation can it? Or one would have to imagine that Focardi himself has been conned. Note that multi-kW excess heat must be quite easy to fake in this particular device, with its built-in heating resistor. For example, add AC current of a higher frequency than the meter's bandwidth. > Is there any support on this research such as a published paper or a > conference presentation or is it just this blog site that is made to look > like a journal? Not that I know, apart from the patent application which of course isn't valid support either. Michel
