2010/3/26 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>:
> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
>> Are there any published works showing nuclear phenomena such as excess
>> heat, correlated with deuterium percentage? I'm starting with 99.9% D2O
>>  (atom percent D). What would be the difference I should expect with 98%
>> D2O, which is substantially cheaper? I've seen rumors that ordinary water
>> "poisons" the reaction. If so, at what level?
>
> With solid Pd in the conventional FP configuration, even a little light
> water poisons the reaction. I think even 1 or 2% but I do not recall. Storms
> says that with electrolysis the Pd preferentially absorbs the H atoms so the
> concentration of H in the lattice is soon higher than in the starting
> liquid.

Interesting. If this is true, it must be a purely electrochemical
effect, probably related to the lower thermoneutral potential (1.48V
for H2O vs 1.54V for D2O) as D is, unintuitively, both more soluble
and more diffusive than H in Pd.

Michel

> Heavy water is hygroscopic. (Try saying that word three times in a row!)
> Meaning it readily absorbs ordinary water from the air. You might say it
> wants to get back to its natural ratio of 1:6,700 atoms. Anyway, people
> sometimes leave bottles of heavy water open to the air during experiments,
> and this ruins them by reducing purity. To prevent this with open-cell
> experiments, Bockris recommended putting the heavy water reservoir in a
> plastic IV bag with an IV tube leading down to the cell, with one of those
> itty-bitty stopcocks at the top of the cell. You exclude air the whole way.
> You dump and throw away the first small amount of little heavy water that
> comes through the empty tube. Bockris also thought that CO2 poisons the
> reaction. Or any kind of carbon.
>
> Storms also used an IV bag in some tritium studies, I assume for the same
> reason:
>
> http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEastudyofel.pdf
>
> Those bags are clean and airtight and made to high standards, since air or
> contamination might harm the patient.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to