In reply to  Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:11:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>
>On 01/14/2011 05:04 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
>> A demolishing criticism
>> <http://scientopia.org/blogs/goodmath/2010/11/16/grandiose-crackpottery-proves-pi4/>
>> of Miles Mathis, particularly on his paper about Pi being 4
>> <http://milesmathis.com/pi.html> (among many other things, Miles shows
>> that Pi equals four, with an elegant(and wrong) "proof", which
>> basically boils down to this
>> <http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lbxrvcK4pk1qbylvso1_400.png>)
>
>Nice, and that last link's a very cute proof, and nice illustration of
>what arc-length /doesn't/ mean, as well as being an example of an
>unexpected encounter with a fractal.
>
>Here's another, vaguely related "one-page-puzzle" (uses the same goofy
>grinning head, otherwise unrelated):
>
>http://i.imgur.com/IKFiu.jpg
>
>It's so totally crude, so silly, and yet ... so hard to see why it won't
>work...
>
Look at the energy required to force open the valve on the "air" side as a ball
enters the water (at depth against the water pressure).

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html

Reply via email to