Greetings Vortex-L My friend Dr Takaaki Musha will be giving a paper on ZPE Propulsion in Aosta, Italy in early 2011. Dr Musha is now with the MoD, Ministry of Defense -Japan Infinite-Energy usually prints his papers.
Dr Takaaki Musha is known for his Electrogravity Research at the Honda Corporation...a google search.. Dr Musha and Kimio Nishino, General Manager . Toyota are known for their advanced propulsion research. Also, I received a call from Mr Nishino from STAIF 2000. He said it was the AG cars of the movie: Fifth Element that inspired some of his research. Toyota is far more than Lexis- Prius. Ad Astra, Ron Kita, Chiralex On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Roarty, Francis X < francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > I just read a 2002 paper , Engineering the Zero-Point Field and > Polarizable Vacuum for Interstellar Flight by Puthoff, > > http://www.gravitycontrol.org/pdf/jbisZPE.pdf and think there is a > loophole regarding propellantless propulsion where his statement that the > center of mass must remain constant can be broken by use of a secondary > mass contained inside the primary mass but with a different temporal > co-ordinate – inertial frame. That is to say that you can move your > spaceship with vacuum engineering of gas m olecules along an axial coil made > of changing Casimir geometry. For whatever reason molecular gas opposes > changes in energy density brought about by changes in nano geometry while > atomic gas does not. This property allows us to use the gas molecules like > “etheric” oars in one direction while repositioning the oars for another > pull by either removing the suppression or disassociating the molecule to > unbalance the inertial reaction. I am not creating something that “thrusts” > against space time but rather am varying the inertia of the gas in alternate > directions. This creates a needed displacement where the nano geometry > center of mass resides at X,Y,Z,T while the gas center of mass resides at > X,Y,Z,t’ . The gas molecules oppose change in energy density and must be > forced through the changing geometry while being kept cryogenically cooled > to prevent disassociation – essentially the tail is wagging the dog instead > of employing the chaotic nature o f flux on gas in suppression to produce > energy we want to use energy to drive the suppressed molecular gas to > interact more strongly with the flux/ temporarily changing the inertial > properties of the gas in one direction. > > > > IMHO the Rossi, Mills, Arrata energy anomalies are all INITIALLY based on > ashless chemistry where changes in this nano geometry are enough to > disassociate heated gas that is kept near the threshold point by extracting > thermal energy in a carefully balanced reaction. The initial heating doesn’t > effect the balance because the oscillation between h1<>h2 is endless and > only limited by the migration speed of the gas relative to changes in > geometry inside the cavity. Propulsion however requires keeping h2 from > disassociating whil e driving the gas through suppressed geometry in one > direction while returning it in the opposite direction without suppression. > Two axial supression coils on the length of the outer hull of your > spaceship with a common return in the center would negate any rotational > forces. > > Regards > > Fran > > >
