on  Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:27 Harry Veeder wrote
[snip]The concept of quantum mechanical tunneling suggests that a particle can, 
with a certain probability, bore its way through a columb barrier. Suppose, 
instead, the probability is indicative of a fluctuating columb field in which 
portals momentarily open and close. A particle that happens to be moving 
quickly enough and is headed in the right direction would be able to coast 
through an opening before it closes.[/snip]

Harry, Your description also supports Naudt's proposal of relativistic hydrogen 
- this isn't hydrogen at near C spatial velocity but equivalent acceleration 
caused by DIRECT manipulation of vacuum energy density using suppression. Your 
statement [snip] "A particle that happens to be moving quickly enough and is 
headed in the right direction would be able to coast through an opening before 
it closes.[/snip] has a temporal interpretation. The "opening" of which you 
speak is the Pythagorean difference of matter in different inertial frames to 
the time axis, IMHO the hydrogen undergoes the same gamma transformation as if 
were travelling at near luminal SPATIAL velocity and coasting into a stationary 
Ni atom. From a 4d perspective the "equivalent" velocity of Hydrogen persists 
(coasts) long enough to interact with nearly stationary (by comparison) Ni.  
The 3D orientation of the stationary Ni coulomb barrier to the time axis is 
different than the orientation of the 3D electric field of the accelerated 
hydrogen to the time axis. The opposition is discounted by the reduced overlap 
of 3D space - from each others perspective they both seem reduced in physical 
size but unlike Lorentzian contraction on a spatial vector I believe 
"equivalent" acceleration results in a symetrical contraction on all spatial 
axis because the "equivalent" vector is displaced 90 degrees from the spatial 
plane. Perhaps this is why UFO's give the APPEARANCE of rapid spatial velocity 
and turning ability but are so difficult for radar to track :_)

Regards
Fran


Reply via email to