>
>From: "Roarty, Francis X" <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>
>To: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 9:26:31 AM
>Subject: RE: [Vo]:"Tunneling"
>
>
>on Wednesday, March 02, 2011 11:27 Harry Veeder wrote
>[snip]The concept of quantum mechanical tunneling suggests that a
>particle can,
>with a certain probability, bore its way through a columb
>barrier. Suppose, instead, the probability is indicative of a
>fluctuating columb field in which portals momentarily open and close.
>A particle
>
>that happens to be moving quickly enough and is headed in the right direction
>would be able to coast through an opening before it closes.[/snip]
>
>Harry, Your description also supports Naudt’s proposal of relativistic
>hydrogen
>– this isn’t hydrogen at near C spatial velocity but equivalent acceleration
I am not familiar with this concept of equivalent acceleration.
>caused by DIRECT manipulation of vacuum energy density using suppression.
Is the lattice responsible for this suppression?
> Your
>statement [snip] “A particle that happens to be moving quickly enough and
>is headed in the right direction would be able to coast through an opening
>before it closes.[/snip] has a temporal interpretation. The “opening” of which
>you speak is the Pythagorean difference of matter in different inertial frames
>to the time axis, IMHO the hydrogen undergoes the same gamma transformation as
>if were travelling at near luminal SPATIAL velocity and coasting into a
>stationary Ni atom. From a 4d perspective the “equivalent” velo city of
>Hydrogen
>
>persists (coasts) long enough to interact with nearly stationary (by
>comparison)
>
>Ni. The 3D orientation of the stationary Ni coulomb barrier to the time axis
>is
>
>different than the orientation of the 3D electric field of the accelerated
>hydrogen to the time axis. The opposition is discounted by the reduced overlap
>of 3D space – from each others perspective they both seem reduced in physical
>size but unlike Lorentzian contraction on a spatial vector I believe
>“equivalent” acceleration results in a symetrical contraction on all spatial
>axis because the “equivalent” vector is displaced 90 degrees from the spatial
>plane. Perhaps this is why UFO’s give the APPEARANCE of rapid spatial velocity
>and turning ability but are so difficult for radar to track :_)
The 4D stuff is hard to follow. ;-)
