In reply to Angela Kemmler's message of Tue, 03 May 2011 05:55:22 +0200: Hi, [snip] >Here we have (it's easy to hear in the video, listen to the regular "tok..tok" >noise) 31 strokes/minute. Lewan tells us: 63.3 ml/min. This confirms, the the >stroke volume was 2 ml. Now, we know also, that the maximal flow rate of this >pump is 12.1 l/hr. How is it reached? 12.1/h divided by 60 is 202 ml/min. That >is the value at 2 ml volume and 100 strokes/min. The maximum, right? What do >we get at 31 strokes? It is 0.31 multiplyed with 202. Check: ist is 62. OK. >Now, lets check it with the pumps "tok tok" noise of 14 of january: we clearly >hear 60 beats/min. And that is 60 x 2 = 120 ml/min. BUT: in the report we find >the value 292 ml/min (=17.5 l/hr). Or Lewan made a mistake AND the data sheet >of the pump is wrong, OR the author of the report made a mistake. A big >mistake in favor of the claimed principle. A 243 % mistake ! Or, in other >words, the claimed power was much lower. Instead of 12.4 kW we have only 4.9 >kW. (how we explain that is another issue) I have the impressio! > n, that someone is OR cheating (don't forget: its also a big business) or > someone is incompetent.
Is it certain that the pump used is this experiment is the same one used in Jan? Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
