Stimulating is good, negative stimulents as Steve's reaction are better, it seems. (No more tests, who said it?)
We had the opportunity to observe that the E-cat has quite sharp verbal claws, not always retracted. Let's hope there will be energetically independent greater E-cats. On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Akira Shirakawa <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hello group, > > Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info: > > * * * > > http://www.journal-of-nuclear-**physics.com/?p=360&cpage=12#** > comment-46906<http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=12#comment-46906> > > Dear C.Monti: > Thanks for your smart insight. > About the question: in these days we are making tests with zero energy > input, to try to make them safe. Probably we are close. The day before > yesterday a new Cat worked for one hour producing 15 kWh/h without energy > input, then I had to stop mit because it was continuing to raise energy > output. Anyway: yes, we have a power back up if grid goes black out. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > * * * > > When people start doubting, release new unexpected info. > > It appears Rossi is now close to producing 15 kW E-Cat devices that can > reliabily work with no input energy. Magnificent! Now, let's hope he will > soon be able to show one of them to the public for a reasonably long amount > of time. That would be the conclusive proof of validity. > > Cheers, > S.A. > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
