ahh... so it is nothing more than misunderstanding about the meaning of the word "report". Harry
----- Original Message ---- > From: Akira Shirakawa <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Sun, June 19, 2011 1:32:02 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Why Levi is upset > > On 2011-06-19 02:37, Harry Veeder wrote: > > > If I recall correctly someone wrote on the vortex list back in feburary or >march > > that Galantini never wrote a report, so that fact is not news. Steven > > Kirvit managed to catch Levi uttering a 'white lie' to *him*. Is that fact > > news? > > Try read the following comment by Rossi. It might explain what happened. >Somehow I missed it. > > * * * > > Andrea Rossi > June 18th, 2011 at 4:02 AM > “Rossi Responds to Scrutiny of his Claims”: > The content of water in steam is always measured in mass, not in volume, >because psychrometers work is based on the heat necessary to the evaporation >ow >residual water, and the heat is given in Joule/g, wherein g means grams. >Krivit >is not convinced only because has not the elementary knowledge of the physics >involved. > > He had all the necessary explications from us, just did not (or wanted not) > to >understand. By the way: in a statement he released further, he said that while >Prof. Levi told him there was a report about this issue, I said in the >interview >that there was not a report about this issue. This is a translation problem: >with the term “report” > I mean an extensive paper, while Prof. Levi referred to the simple >communication that we received from the specialist who made the measurement, >in >which there were just the results. This is a misunderstanding, not a >contradiction. > > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > * * * > > By the way, there are two new blogposts on New Energy Times. I found the >message by Rossi above in the first link below: > >http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/06/19/rossis-responses-to-preliminary-report/ >/ >
