It is more about the personality of the generator. Even if the elementary conditions of intensity and continuity are fulfilled there are serious doubts regarding its complex *reliability -* day to day, E-cat to E-cat, batch to batch reproducibility, adjustability, constancy. Rossi speaks about danger to much, why smaller E-cats are more safe. The problem of scale-up is unsolved- and combining 300 unreliable generators has small chances to give one great reliable machine. The basic know-why seems also weak. THe Defkalion people know more about the reliability of the E-cat, hopefully they will revert this bad impression. They have to sell the E-cats, in clutters or as individual sets. After selling chairs with one foot missing your marketing is in great trouble. For example if they say- we have already teste d 120 E cats- see here the results in statistical form and they are OK...then I go to the Greek restaurant in our town and drink a small glass of ouzo.
As Hamlet would say: "To be reliable, or not to be!" Peter On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rock_nj wrote: > > These communications by Rossi are taking a bizarre turn. All this >> paranoid talk about reporters acting for competitors and telling everyone to >> just wait for the big demonstration a few months away is making me very >> suspicious of Rossi's claims of inventing a new energy producing device. >> > > This is how Rossi talks. This is his personality. I suggest you ignore this > and try to judge the situation based on what other people who have observed > and reported about his machine. As I have often said, if we are going to > judge this claim based on the personality of the inventor, we will dismiss > it. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
