On 11-07-04 04:47 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Harry Veeder <hlvee...@yahoo.com <mailto:hlvee...@yahoo.com>> wrote:Peter Ekstrom's analysis: "the E-Cat does not produce excess Energy". http://www.fysik.org/WebSite/fragelada/resurser/cold_fusion_krivit.pdf Rossi responds to Peter Ekstrom's analysis: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=497#comments Rossi has completely lost it. [...]5. The pressure in the ecat cannot be room pressure, or the fluid would not flow out of the ecat into the room.
Galantini has said that he measured the pressure in the device and it was the same as ambient. Make of that what you will -- presumably it means it was the same as pressure in the room to within the precision of the measuring instrument used, but Galantini provided no numbers so it's anybody's guess.
