>From Catania: ...
> The write-up that Lewan gives shoes his lack of general physics > knowledge and that he is most likely a paid & biased spokesperson. That is your speculation. However, since you seem convinced of such speculation, how do you plan on going about convincing... let me rephrase that, PROVING to the rest of the world that Lewan is indeed nothing more than a carnival barker? ...or are you just speculat'n, here? It leads me to wonder: Are the rest of your speculations based on the same caliber of personal conjecture? >From Peter: ... > Also it shows us, the experiment still cannot run unattended. As far as speculation goes, I find myself in sympathy with such speculation. What I find interesting about such speculation is that it suggests to me the distinct possibility that somewhere within the contraption anomalous heat may indeed be generated when input power is turned off. However, controlling and measuring these anomalous conditions isn't as predictable as Rossi might like us to believe. Actually, alluding to such speculation is a no-brainer. Rossi has pretty much alluded to it. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
