Alan, excellent work again. Considering Akira's temperature graph, we
can take that draining took about 5-7 min. In the beginning pressure
was 210 kPa or 122°C. But it is needed to take into consideration,
that valve was opened slowly. In the end of video, valve was only half
open.

http://i.imgur.com/lU42G.png

Therefore I think that we have now rather conclusive proof, that
indeed, temperature gives us at least approximately the pressure
inside E-Cat. It is not anymore just an assumption, but data supports
the idea.


    –Jouni



2011/9/21 Alan J Fletcher <a...@well.com>:

> I just ran the calculations for draining a 30L eCat through a 0.25 cm radius
> tap.
>
> http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_sep11_f.php
>
> The drain-time says 2 Bars !!!!!
>
> 6. Discharge at the End
>
> I can't figure out the "dumping" of the water at the end, either. Is it 100C
> water, or is it 118C water? 1 Bar or 2 Bars ?
>
> I've never seen 25L of boiling water dumped through a tap, so I don't know
> what it should look like. It does appear to come out under pressure, and it
> does seem to flash to steam at the edge of the stream -- both supporting
> evidence for an internal pressure of 2 Bars. The video ends before the
> discharge is complete.
>
> Time to drain tank
>
> The drain is at a depth of 30 cm and 30 liters is to be drained (based on
> the dimensions of 60 x 50 x 30 cm). The radius of the outlet tap is about
> 0.25 cm.
>
> For atmospheric pressure (1 Bar) the time to drain is 1260.18 secs ( 21.00
> min)
>
> For a pressure of 2 Bar we can ADD 33 feet of water to the tank height
> (draining from 33 feet + 30cm to 33 feet + 0 cm). The time to drain is then
> 108.02 secs ( 1.80 min)
>
> Although the video ended before the eCat was completely drained, the time
> shown on the video (6:44 to 8:05) -- or 1.83 minutes tends indicate 2 bars
> pressure, not 1 bar.
>
> The time to discharge, the fact that the flow did not diminish, and that the
> water seemed to flash into steam around the edge, all support the
> "pressurized" hypothesis.
>
> The general argument is the same as for the hose outlet -- 118C water would
> flash rapidly.
>
>

Reply via email to