Clearly your calculations are a bit off. The running time on video is more like 
1:20, still greater than drain time for 2 atm, showing there is less than 2atm 
pressure. But since we don't know for how long the draining continues we dont 
know how much less. Since the E-Cat is open to atmosphere (by report) we can 
assume the pressure is 1 atm. Also 1/4 cm seems a bit small for the orifice and 
drain time would seem to affected by height of water column.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Alan J Fletcher 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 5:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Calculations for 1 MW plant. + Time to Drain the eCat


  At 12:49 PM 9/20/2011, Joe Catania wrote:

    The point is that a gallon empties very quickly even though not vented at 
the top. The sound it makes is immaterial and is most like caused by the water 
hitting the barrel. I don't know why you feel the water is under inordinate 
pressure. The E-CAt is open to the atmosphere unless Lewan seals the other 
valve. I doubt this as the water seems to be drainig with venting. Why not ask 
Lewan how long it took to empty the E-Cat?
    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Horace Heffner" <hheff...@mtaonline.net>
    To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:46 PM
    Subject: Re: [Vo]:Calulations for 1 MW plant.



    On Sep 20, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Joe Catania wrote:


      Yes a sealed galon bottle may dribble if a hole is poked but if its 
vented at the top you should get a steady stream. Or if air enters through the 
bottom you don't get a dribble! I scan't confirm high velocity flow in the 
video. Since you can't tell me the rate of  flow out the valve we have nothing 
to discuss. The video runs for  about 1 minute 20 seconds before ending and the 
tank is still  emptying. I assume ~20L of water in the tank.


    Sigh.  Look at the video! Do you hear a gurgle gurgle gurgle or a
    high powered wooshhhh? The water is obviously under high pressure.
    The couple atmospheres pressure estimate by others does not seem
    off.   You need a numerical velocity to determine the difference?


  I just ran the calculations for draining a 30L eCat through a 0.25 cm radius 
tap.

  http://lenr.qumbu.com/rossi_ecat_sep11_f.php 

  The drain-time says 2 Bars !!!!!  


  6. Discharge at the End
  I can't figure out the "dumping" of the water at the end, either. Is it 100C 
water, or is it 118C water? 1 Bar or 2 Bars ?

  I've never seen 25L of boiling water dumped through a tap, so I don't know 
what it should look like. It does appear to come out under pressure, and it 
does seem to flash to steam at the edge of the stream -- both supporting 
evidence for an internal pressure of 2 Bars. The video ends before the 
discharge is complete.

  Time to drain tank

  The drain is at a depth of 30 cm and 30 liters is to be drained (based on the 
dimensions of 60 x 50 x 30 cm). The radius of the outlet tap is about 0.25 cm.

  For atmospheric pressure (1 Bar) the time to drain is 1260.18 secs ( 21.00 
min)

  For a pressure of 2 Bar we can ADD 33 feet of water to the tank height 
(draining from 33 feet + 30cm to 33 feet + 0 cm). The time to drain is then 
108.02 secs ( 1.80 min)

  Although the video ended before the eCat was completely drained, the time 
shown on the video (6:44 to 8:05) -- or 1.83 minutes tends indicate 2 bars 
pressure, not 1 bar.

  The time to discharge, the fact that the flow did not diminish, and that the 
water seemed to flash into steam around the edge, all support the "pressurized" 
hypothesis.

  The general argument is the same as for the hose outlet -- 118C water would 
flash rapidly.

Reply via email to