I have not yet had time to compile the four hours of "warm up". Obviously, we
don't have all of the data required to even remotely show a balanced energy
equation.
The "at or near parity" statement was referring to E-Cat performance before it
was turned off. One would expect an operating E-Cat that is consuming 2 kW
input power, to be displaying 12 kW output power during operation.
This does not appear to be what was demonstrated.
If the E-Cat was running at a high enough core temperature to produce 3.5 kW
output, while 2.5 kW was being introduced to the heater (230V x 11A), then why
did the output not immediately drop to 1 kW when the power was removed? Why did
it not slowly decline and stabilize at a new baseline that represented the
E-Cat's output power? How does it maintain the same output power, when you've
removed 2 kW of input? Is he claiming that the E-Cat isn't producing its own
heat for the first 4 hours, and now it only operates when you REMOVE power from
the heaters?
These questions would never have to be asked if we were only evaluating 8 hours
of operating gains, and that's point in its entirety.
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:NyTeknik report on October 6th test
> From: cchayniepub...@gmail.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:21:18 -0400
>
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 09:01 -0500, Robert Leguillon wrote:
> > My Two Cents:
> >
> > Whiskey. Tango. Foxtrot.
> >
> > Most of the previous experimental problems were solved in this setup.
> > We could've seen measurable, stable, power gains completely unaffected
> > by phase-change or water overflow. We should have been presented with
> > an operating E-Cat producing 6 or more times input power. Instead, we
> > were asked to evaluate a temperature decay of an E-Cat, whose power
> > output was at or near parity with the input, while a new device
> > "produces frequencies."
>
> I disagree with this. During the 'power phase', you can measure the
> power coming out of the system as heat. The conclusion is far away from
> a 4 hour 'charging phase' followed by a 3 1/2 hour 'discharging phase'
> of near equal parity.
>
> Craig
>
>
>
