Robert, I agree with you completely that the other tests did not have dry vapor output. I concluded that the October 6 test had a quality of about 20% at the time that Mats Lewan collected his .91 grams/second measurement. If this latest monster cat was a copy of those devices in parallel, then I would be in the same camp as Cude.
But, Rossi definitely appears to have 3 cores active for the 1 MW components. They put out at least 2 times the power in the self sustaining mode as the October 6 test device and the positive feedback due to core interaction makes the time domain fall off rate much less. These devices are different animals due to the added cores. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, Nov 19, 2011 12:35 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:High school physics says > 1 GJ excess energy for the Oct. 28 demo Dave, ave you examined the earlier E-Cat tests? Before the "Fat-Cat" (or as Nasa alls it the "Ottoman", Rossi was claiming complete vaporization under ircumstances that were obviously, I mean REALLY obviously, wrong. his is the main reason that skeptics have been referring to the condensed, ecirculating, steam as "the steam trick" redux. ou may have reviewed all of this, and if so, I apologize. You just seem to make ome intelligent observations, and I wonder if you are missing some background rom June and earlier. id you read: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2011/37/3706appendixa1.shtml t's a great summation of what Cude is trying to get across.
