On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote:
> Hank Mills > November 21st, 2011 at 11:24 PM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=563&cpage=1#comment-126865> > > Cremating Thermal Inertia With A Custom E-Cat Test<SNIP> > As I've been saying ad nauseam et exhaustiam, it's a great concept but it won't work unless it's the same E-cat and of course nothing changes on the measuring system between the control and the live tests. Rossi could easily fake a test if he knew which E-cat was the control device. And such a test should be run and observed by people other than Rossi -- Rossi can be there but should keep hands in his pockets at all time. The live part would have to run long enough to rule out the usual suspects -- sources of chemical energy, molten metal heat stores, etc. that Rossi might trigger remotely or have an accomplice trigger. In Hank's world, everything is simple. You can see that by the web site he writes for. They're the ones with the free energy magnetic motors developed in a garage by an impoverished illiterate in a third world country along with the cars that only require water to run. Still, asking for something like that is a step forward for Hank.
