Mary, you are clearly suggesting that this is a scam. Are you that convinced? Where is the possibility that it might be honest?
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, Dec 7, 2011 2:08 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:a long paper about and mainly against the E-cat On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:38 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: Are you convinced that the only way for the system to release 470 kW would be for LENR action to be taking place? Is that your hang-up? Where are the skeptics that claim that energy is stored for long enough and intense enough to continue to heat the output for the full 5.5 hours? Dave There is no need to postulate energy storage in the megawatt plant demonstration. It is only necessary to consider that Rossi's client may be fictitious and that the engineer may work for Rossi, perhaps for quite a very large fee or share. It is also useful to remember that the device was hooked to a running diesel generator capable of 400+ kW of output, and that the experiment was derated to half the original estimated power output. The generator could have supplied all the thermal energy produced in the experiment via the heaters conveniently built in to every E-cat. Because the invited scientists and reporters were not allowed to see any data collection, it would not even have been needed to fake the enthalpy measurement -- it all had to be taken on faith anyway.
