Your interpretation of "begun" should be constrained by the context of the original question in which "begun" is contrasted with "starting up". However, your interpretation of "begun" was not so constrained. I suggest you restate your argument with that in mind.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:03 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net> wrote: > On a cautionary note: Rossi's terse response strikes me as a matter of > personal interpretation. With Rossi, personal interpretation can mean a lot > of different scenarios. I find myself asking, how is Rossi choosing to > exploit the word "begun" in this particular case. > > Maybe it actually does means Rossi & Co. are now building eCats in the U.S. > > ...Or maybe it just means R&Co are thinking about what's all involved in > producing eCats in the U.S.. In other words, maybe they have done nothing > more than to begin thinking about the matter. ...or maybe R&Co is still in > negotiation with various enterprises within the U.S. about what's all > involved in producing eCats. > > Speculation on the word, "begun" can be endless. With no specific details > we > know absolutely nothing other than what Rossi chooses to tell us for public > consumption. > > With Rossi, his use of the word, "begun" in this particular case, strikes > me > as having been strategically stated. It strikes me as an attempt to take > some of the wind out of DGT's recent public announcements. IOW, Rossi is > saying, if you want to cash in on the biggest deal of the century get on > board WITH US NOW!!! AVOID CHEAP IMMITATIONS... aka DGT. > > In matters of marketing, or more specifically, establishing market share, > anything goes. The more outrageous the claim, the better. ;-) > > Regards, > Steven Vincent Johnson > www.OrionWorks.com > www.zazzle.com/orionworks > > >
