Due to the lower torque of the disk, the output rpm should not be used as its own representation of power. In the video, output voltage and current are measured, but the method is unclear. It is certainly not a series measurement, as the probe placement is not required for continuous operation, but he seems to be treating it as such. The reason the measurement is so critical is that the collapsing fields, and resultant disk-assist will create a variance in motor impedance and input current. Very,very careful analysis is needed. A standard voltmeter will have difficulty with erratic waveforms, and certainly don't show the entire picture. For the secondary, you could always pull a waveform from an inline sampling resistor. In the comments he references Thane, so it's most likely the same method.
From: robert.leguil...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:12:03 -0600 The central issue is that Acceleration Under Load (AUL) is a misnomer. The acceleration is occurring when coils are being shorted. Two issues arise: 1) The initial power/rpm ratio is set while these same "regenerative coils" are presenting opposition to movement. In most experiments, just moving the coils out of the way would result in more rpm/watt. 2) Shorting the coil does create a collapsing magnetic field. The time constant of the collapsing field is proportional to the resistance to electrical current. If the shorted coil collapses at just the right speed w.r.t. the disk rotation, it would cause a "push" in the direction of rotation. There could be a higher rpm of rotation at a lower torque value, and only within the narrow band of rotation frequency. In the video > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:19:52 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load > From: hveeder...@gmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > Hopefully it will become free energy device. > > Dozens of amateur researchers ( Steorn included ) have established > that it is possible to circumvent Lenz's law. The hope is this will > eventually lead to a free energy device. > > But even if you can't use a violation of lenz law to generate free > energy, this achievement alone deserves attention from mainstream > engineers and physicists, which it isn't getting. It is a strange > state of affairs. > Harry > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:21 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > > I am confused about the purpose of the experiment. Is this some kind of free > > energy device? If it really works, you should be able to drive the input > > with the output and have it to accelerate in speed or at least keep freely > > moving. If this can not be done, then most likely there is a difficulty in > > reading the true power output and input. > > > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> > > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > > Sent: Sun, Dec 11, 2011 12:53 pm > > Subject: [Vo]:Acceleration Under Load > > > > acceleration under load effect, by deepcut66 > > > > http://youtu.be/vBDOOSOhbz0 > > > > <<The previous setup had physical limitations although it was > > excellent for demonstrating the AUL [acceleration under load] effect. > > This setup lends itself better to harnessing the effect for > > power-generation. > > > > I've done away with the Bedini drive circuitry and replaced it with a > > 12v/6w motor from an Audi message-pump system : > > > > http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/12v-DC-electric-motor-UK-SELLER-/110739940158?pt=UK... > > > > This gives me twice the RPM for a third of the input power, coupled > > with the fact that the rotor has 24 poles, arranged N/S i can now get > > higher frequencies. > > > > This is running at around six or seven hudred Hz. > > > > According to the meters more power is coming out than going in, but we > > all know how deceptive things can be and i can't do proper > > measurements until i get my hands on a scope, which i will get in the > > new year.>> > > >
