On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 15:10 -0500, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: > I don't know. The hotter the better the reaction. The hotter the > more hydrogen is driven out and the worse the reaction. > If I knew I would do it. > But doesn't your theory revolve around the idea that the distances affected by the nuclear forces change when molecules vibrate at a specific frequency -- the frequency which will allow an impedance match between energy as it moves from inside a nucleus to outside the nucleus -- the frequency at which the individual molecules are vibrating at 1.094 MHz-meters?
If so, then doesn't this translate into a specific temperature? Craig On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 15:10 -0500, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: > I don't know. The hotter the better the reaction. The hotter the > more hydrogen is driven out and the worse the reaction. > If I knew I would do it. > > > > Frank > Frank! > > As I understand your theory, you believe that cold fusion can be > optimized within a lattice vibrating with an angular velocity of > (1.094 / pi) meters / sec, right? Can you predict the optimum > temperature of Rossi's nickel that would facilitate this effect? > > Craig Haynie > Manchester, NH > > > >
