AG,
I am just repeating what Jones Beene has posted (look at his post and
what he said there). Perhaps I misunderstood him.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg61115.html
His reference to "payola" and its italian wording could mean Giampaolo
Di Paola, the Chairman of the NATO Military Committee.
But yes, I also know Rossis statements... We will see, hopefully soon...
Wolf
Wolf,
Rossi has stated the customer is a US organization engaged in military
research, the first 1 MW plant was at the customers site in the US and
that he and others have attended to install the plant. Later he
stated, he, the customer's engineer and NI are working on the advanced
control system and they have made excellent progress.
AG
On 1/15/2012 9:17 AM, Wolf Fischer wrote:
Hi AG,
Jones gave a lot of hints in his answer to my questions 4:30 hours
earlier. The customers name seems to start with "N", is an
organization in Brussel, Rossi also once mentioned the name in the
context of the 28th october 1MW test while talking about the
"Colonel" (my guess, the name has four letters and ends with "O" ;)).
Wolf
Interesting info. So you are confirming Rossi DID ship the 1 MW
reactor to his customer. That it did not work over extended periods
is to be expected with new technology. If this has happened it says
2 things:
Rossi did ship the reactor to his customer. Excellent news
The reactor did work but not as the customer expected. Also
excellent news as it does work.
Rossi is working to rectify any issues. Again excellent news as
Rossi is working to meet the customers needs.
So the customer is real, the device works but not as reliably as the
customer expects and Rossi is working with NI to meet the customer's
expectations.
This is a real world result. This is an excellent result. This is
product development in the flesh.
So Mr. Beene now that you have started talking, who is the customer?
AG
On 1/15/2012 2:23 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Why read something else into this? LOL. You must be joking.
Because Rossi spoke it, for one thing - and because it is
misleading for
another, just short of complete dishonesty.
You should know this, AG - if you talk to Rossi as much as you
claim; and if
he is being straight with you.
Rossi did deliver, yes, but "the customer" has sent it back.
Rossi's spin: "we will add controls". Only Rossi has NOT even
admitted that
it has been returned. That would sound too much like failure.
Customers complaint: *did not work over extended periods*, so of no
value
for intended use, despite the fact that it does work for short
periods. Thus
we sent it back to Bologna.
