Jones, You should have posted the free version of that paper at URL: http://www.ladir.cnrs.fr/pages/fillaux/152_JPCM_2006_3229.pdf
Also related may be the paper: Proton transfer across hydrogen bonds: From reaction path to Schrödingers cat* http://media.iupac.org/publications/pac/2007/pdf/7906x1023.pdf and other citing papers at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cites=14755060705510149149&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=QTwWT4uZMq3KiAKR1YTGDw&sa=X&oi=science_links&ct=sl-citedby&resnum=2&ved=0CCkQzgIwAQ This is very interesting but also very difficult reading - even apart from CF/LENR connections. I have not really seen related material before. Hopefully, some more elementary introductory papers are available. If I find any, I will post pointers to them. Do you know of any? Regards, Lou Pagnucco > Thanks for posting this - and it is intriguing in one way but flawed in > another - certainly in the suggested binding energy. If it were true, the > nickel active material would be completely unmeltable, for one thing. > There > is no basis for going to that extreme. > > The most obvious flaw in this theory goes back to the vagaries of the QM > species called a multiparticle, which is theorized as an variety of > entangled species but otherwise is imaginary. Of course, the neutrino was > also imaginary at one early stage. OTOH, the part about entanglement is > possibly the best feature, in explaining E-Cat/Hyperion - because the > sudden > loss of entanglement is the elegant way to explain the huge problem of > periodic quiescence. And the appearance of entanglement explains how the > strong force can be used for gain without fusion or fission. And the > re-emergence of entanglement explains why the reactor can be started up > again easily but with a time delay. > > In Rossis reactor, these Russian theorists say the multiparticle is > created > by the color interaction of molecular hydrogen H2 electrons and Ni crystal > lattice atoms valence electrons. This kind of sounds like > spintronics/excitonics - and it should. The more you think about it, the > more sense it makes. > > But there are two big problems before moving forward - first, > multiparticles > have not been documented as real AFAIK - and second, certainly not > detected > with anything close to this binding energy (~300 keV). They need to get > realistic on the binding energy. Spintronics/excitonic potential energy is > far less. > > Of course, the proof could be E-cat/Hyperion and even Thermacore. We have > talked about entanglement before - and this is the second best way to > realize how it would work in practice. The best way is still to suggest > that > the nickel is responsible for spillover and surface pitting provides the > rigidity. Proton entanglement of dense surface hydrogen (2D) makes sense > as > it is already bound in 5 or 6 atoms, according to Holmlid, and certain > kinds > of surface crystals makes sense too - especially since one particular > paper > can explain the earlier Thermacore work with Potassium catalyst. See > "Macroscopic quantum entanglement and super-rigidity of protons in the > KHCO3 crystal" Abstract here: > > http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984/18/12/006 > > If we find out that either Rossi or DGT did copy Thermacore's use of > potassium carbonate as the so called "secret" then the entanglement > hypothesis will vault ahead of all the others as the most likely > explanation. > > Please post the news - if anyone finds reference or evidence to potassium > carbonate in either of these newer devices. It will definitely be the > smoking gun. > > BTW "hydrogen potassium carbonate" is expected from the dehydrogenated > molecule, in the presence of spillover, and the initial entanglement could > be a nano-magnetic phenomenon of the adjoining nickel. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ecat builder > > Here is an alternate site for download: > > http://ecatplanet.net/downloads/pdf/Reaktor_Rossi.pdf > > - Brad > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:23 AM, <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> wrote: >> The website has been down for some time now. >> It keeps returning the message: Bandwidth Exceeded ... try again later. >> >> It sounds like a pretty sophisticated theory that only a few can >> properly >> assess. Does it make any testable predictions? Or does it provide any >> insights into the CF/LENR results reported so far? > > > > >
