Haha! :D 2012/1/22 John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com>
> OK. Have a nice day. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > *To:* John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:36 AM > > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage. > > Rossi installed the other box at the customer's site, he even supervise > it. Probably he also tested the other box there. > > 2012/1/22 John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> > > I believe that is a brand new theory! Congratulations. > > So... The secret company set up a big, secret acceptance test, which, > although secret, had lots of outsiders, including reporters, to report on > the secret acceptance test. There was only one BBB at the location, and > that's the BBB the secret customer secretly tested, while all the reporters > and everyone watched. > > Then, the secret customer buys a different, secret BBB that Rossi had > stashed away somewhere else. I guess that one is a loaner, until Rossi > fixes the one they actually tested. Good thing the different, secret BBB > apparently works better than the one they tested, which still isn't ready > for use after thee months! > > This theory really brings into question why they bothered having the > secret acceptance test (with all the reporters and outsiders watching) when > that wasn't even the box they were buying. Either the secret customer > hauled off an untested BBB, or the October 28th test was nothing more than > a publicity stunt by Rossi. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > *To:* John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:19 AM > > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage. > > Sure! You are right. He said he was present in the installation of other > box in the customer's site. > > 2012/1/22 John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> > > Not to mention that on 10/30 Rossi answered "Yes" to the question "Have > you started building another 1MW in another container?" > > He said nothing about having finished a second box, nor of having shipped > it. It's clear from his answers that the first box is gone (lie) and that > he is working on a second box (lie, unless he's building the second box at > a different location). > > ------------------------------ > *From:* John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> > *To:* "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2012 10:08 AM > > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage. > > So... Rossi had the "old" container in his warehouse on 10/28, for the dog > & pony show. Meanwhile, he had a second box hidden somewhere else (or he > build a second one between 10/28 and 10/30, when he claimed it was "gone"). > The secret customer tested the old box, but took delivery of the new box. > > But Rossi admitted recently that he's working on the old box to make it > ready for the secret customer, who you claim has a different, previously > unknown box. > > Sure! That makes perfect sense. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > *To:* John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, January 22, 2012 9:47 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:The 1MW container is not from old footage. > > Rossi said that there were 2 containers. Since the definite article "the" > did not specify each one, he said yes! Meaning, the one which was not shown > in the videos was gone. > > > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com > > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
