By the way, do you mean that when people like Widom-Larsen talk of "coherent patch of coherent protons" it is bose-einstein condensate of protons cooper pair ?
I think this is what Widom-Larsen supporters mean, but for some reason they don’t really want to say Bose-Einstein Condensation. It may be the fear of talking about high temperature coherence. Ultra cold temperature (UCT) physics is just an experimental technique that allows the researcher to see what is going on in his experiment. But this research technique does not restrict the observed UCT phenomena from happening at high temperatures. On a related note, form an engineering perspective I believe that lack of control of coherence is why there has been so little control over cold fusion results. There is a direct relationship between system wide QM coherence and the production of excess heat. Sometimes an experimenter like Piantelli would see little heat and then on another experiment, his experiment would melt down in a runaway reaction. Rossi also has had trouble controlling coherence and his reactor is more likely than not to melt down if not constantly tinkered with. DGT may have the best approach so far in controlling coherence; I don’t trust Rossi yet in knowing how to fully control his reaction. On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>wrote: > By the way, do you mean that when people like Widom-Larsen talk of > "coherent patch of coherent protons" > it is bose-einstein condensate of protons cooper pair ? > > maybe not a BEC, because not at lowest energy level, but at lease a > coherent group of protons cooper-pair ??? > > 2012/2/13 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > >> superatom > > >
