Robin,
Injecting hydrogen would necessarily complicate the reactor setup. I
suppose you would need a very precise injection, filtering and recirculation
system operating at extreme pressure and temperature. This would greatly
increase the cost of your reactor without any guarantee of success. If you
do not recirculate the hydrogen, you would need to have fresh hydrogen being
pumped constantly. I believe that would be counter productive as you would
be replacing hydrogen Rydberg matter with molecular hydrogen - the latter
being unwanted.
Simply designing the reactor for turbulence is a more straightforward
solution.
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: <mix...@bigpond.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ang.: [Vo]:Rydberg matter and the leptonic monopol
In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:19:42 +0800:
Hi,
[snip]
2. I don't believe bulk heating the powder is the best way to create
Rydberg matter. Bulk Heating it would tend to concentrate too much heat on
certain portions of the clump and possibly melt it. At the least, the heat
would probably sinter the nickel powder and destroy all active nano sites.
Someone correct me, but if I remeber correctly, Nickel atom migration and
the start of the sintering process begins to occur at around 500C.
Clearly, with bulk heating, you can not prevent heating a few protions of
that the nickel powder clump to 500C. The goal is to ionize the powder and
hydrogen to create Rydberg matter, not heat it and sinter it and melt it
with bulk heating.
If the Hydrogen is injected through a very small hole, then the gas jet can
be
directed at the Ni powder on the bottom, puffing it up, resulting in
constant
mixing, and ensuring that the temperature of both gas and powder are
constant.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
