Re: [Vo]:LENR detailitis

[integral.property.serv...@gmail.com]

Axil, FYI: http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/563nh.htm and perhaps a peek at a discard I dug out of the trash basket next to my desk sent by a fellow interested person: 1. Consider the nucleus of any virtual partial A       a. A is positively charged. 2. Consider a subset of A, As with a unit mass of 1       a. Let As = p       b. Name p Proton       c. p has a unit positive charge. 3. Consider A surrounded by empty energy wells of positive electrostatic fields able to fill in proportion to the distance from an approaching negative charge.       a. Let p be located at the precise center of a spherical energy well such that the well depth or energy density potential varies by discrete jumps from the beginning of a radius and traveling outwardly.       b. Assign p mass mP (Of the Gravitational ratio Force to Acceleration) defined as the arbitrary quantity mP=938.3 MeV/c2 The nuclear magnetic moment is expressed in terms of the nuclear spin in the form: where we have now introduced a new unit called a nuclear magneton. For free protons with spin I =1/2, the magnetic moments are of the form: where the proton g-factor: Proton: g = 5.5856912 +/- 0.0000022 and more at: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/nspin.html May all my friends here be attracted by a thirst for knowledge to explore in depth the mysteries of cold fusion mathematically. Warm Regards, Reliable Axil Axil wrote: Then under influence of magnetic and gravitational fields,   When the only driver in the system is heat, where does the magnetic field come from. On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM, integral.property.serv...@gmail.com <integral.property.serv...@gmail.com> wrote: Eric, Already understood. H=>p+ + e- What do you think ionization is? I side with Chan. http://chan.host-ed.me/ ZAP energy => H2 => proton cation plus hydride anion (See image on site). Or obtain from metal hydride. Hydride anion fits into Ni nano matrix structure in an orderly manner. Then under influence of magnetic and gravitational fields, oscillates in tandem with its sisters and achieves entrance into the Ni nucleus. The rest is history. Warm regards, Reliable Eric Walker wrote: I wrote:    What I would love to see are some (very) simple statements that    all can agree on that, if tested and found conclusively true or    false to everyone's satisfaction, would help to sift between the    competing explanations. I offer one such possible statement as an example:    * Ionization of the atomic hydrogen or deuterium required for a      LENR-type reaction to proceed. This seems like something that could be tested with one or more clever experiments and found to be false.  It would probably be harder to prove that it is true, but that's generally the case with any proposition, so I don't think it should be a problem here. Storms mentions four proposed limitations to any theory:    * Neutrons do not initiate cold fusion reactions.    * Spontaneous local concentration of energy cannot be the cause of      nuclear reactions.    * Compact clusters of deuterons cannot form spontaneously simply      by occupying sites in palladium that are too small to permit      normal bond lengths.    * For energy to be released from a nuclear reaction, at least two      products must be produced. I like these proposed limitations, since they can all be true or false, but a reservation I have is that some or all of them are quite general and possibly hard to test.  What would be nice is a set of statements that are very concrete and testable. Eric