As I recall, the titanium experiments with thermal gain have been with deuterium. Do you have reference to gain with Ti-H instead of Ti-D?
But even if titanium can go either way, and it can be determined that some experiments with hydrogen and other “nano-metric” metals result in excess heat, and some with cooling, then it will possible to look closely to find what third factors are contributory (to whether the reaction goes to net-cooling or net-cooling). IOW – what I am saying is that perhaps ALL reactions with hydrogen loaded metal result in a mix of the two, even the ones that are massively gainful in heat. Perhaps those, such as in Rossi claims, are 90/10 (hot/cold). Perhaps Ahern titanium samples gave 47/53 and it appeared to be cooling but it was only net cooling with significant heat also. If the “missing neutron” or “missing hydrino” ends up with a huge loss of mass-energy, then that covers up a lot of excess heat prior to the loss. This can explain why LERN is generally unreliable – a natural tendency to produce a balance of excess heat and excess cooling - and it requires some unknown intervention to shift the balance. From: Eric Walker * * there have been experiments using titanium in which power was produced; in several, around a single watt, and in one, 76 watts. So if Brian Ahern's anecdotal data are allowed, titanium can yield both power and localized cooling (perhaps energy is being fed into the system from the power outlet to accomplish this). Eric
