On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > It is easy to go over the top with dramatization on this one. > > This scenario does not need to involve parallel universes (in the SciFi > sense) nor anything theological. In fact, Dirac's "reciprocal space" works > fine - as the "repository" for deep hydrinos, and with no other fictional > "baggage" so to speak.
It is related to theology (or at least quasi-theology) since most physicists have faith in CoE. If they didn't they wouldn't bother to imagine neutrinos and parrallel universes. Harry > BTW - for those who do not grasp what actually happened in the EPRI reports, > here is a short synopsis of Ahern's experiments. First, there is a well > insulated reactor with numerous RTDs for accurate temperature measurement. > The reactor is filled with pressurized hydrogen and various sample > nanopowders - including an inert control powder. There is a resistance > heater, drawing in the tens of watts. The current is kept absolutely > constant to the heater, so that there is no variation on P-in during the > run. > > With the 'control', you will find from datalogging that a specific rate of > thermal transfer occurs between the outer RTD, where the heater is located > and the inner. Hydrogen under pressure is a good conductor of heat so this > is normally only a few degrees. For example, in the control setup (no active > powder) one might see 350C on the outside and 340C on the inside. The > difference is minimal and never varies. > > OK - when one switches from the control to active nanopowder, things get > interesting and if there is excess energy from the interaction of hydrogen > with the powder, there will be an "inversion", so that the inner RTD becomes > hotter - often much hotter than the outer. That happens with nano-nickel, > and the resulting temperature can be close to 100 degrees inverted. This is > NOT calorimetry, but there are implications to be firmed up on further > experimentation. > > The interesting part (for this thread) is that with Titanium nanopowder, > instead of a temperature inversion indicating gain, you get an anomalous > "sink." For instance, instead of an expected 10 degree drop (out-to-in) the > spread can be much higher, an order of magnitude perhaps, indicating "active > cooling". > > Any round numbers above are for illustration purposes only; but the results > are shocking and significant in both anomalies - heat and cooling. And guess > what, the cooling anomaly could be almost as important as the heating, in > terms of new physics. > > EVEN IF THERE IS NO PATH TO COMERCIALIZATION - for an active cooling > anomaly, it could be important if it points the way to an accurate > understanding of the heat. That is where this is going. > > I haven’t heard a better explanation for active nano-cooling than the > disappearance of matter from one spatial dimension into "reciprocal space." > This space may not be a true dimension, but a fractal instead. "Fractal" is > being used in the original way to mean a fractional dimension. Plus, the > matter which is lost may not be a neutron, per se, but instead a > maximum-redundant hydrino. > > Essentially, what I think happens with nano-titanium cooling is that the > nanoparticles - which are a strong Mills' catalyst - collapse to the full > redundancy in one continuous step - where there is both heat release on > shrinkage, followed immediately by massive heat loss. on the atomic level, > when the hydrino essentially disappears into reciprocal space. The net > result is active cooling. Why it only happens with titanium needs to be > answered. Perhaps it is a momentum effect of some kind. > > E=mc^2 works both ways, apparently - and when mass "disappears" - in a > dimensional sense, so does the corresponding energy it contained. This is > seen as heat removal from a hot reactor. The active species does not have to > be 'mirror matter' as in the original article - but if that helps in > appreciating the view through Alice's 'looking glass' - good! ... it is kind > of catchy, so let's keep it. > > Jones > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harry Veeder > > The mystery of the eternal is now nothing more than CoE. > >> Good find - and the implications are a bit convoluted. The curious thing > is >> that mirror matter neutrons (or deep hydrinos) will explain anomalous heat >> loss quite nicely. >> >> As you may remember, Ahern reported that some of his Arata-style samples >> demonstrated anomalous heat LOSS (more of the samples show gain than loss, >> and only a few showed nothing). >> >> This paper, in fact - could explain anomalous heat loss better than > anything >> I have seen thus far. >> >> BTW the all of the nanopowder samples which showed thermal loss were made > of >> nano-titanium embedded in zirconia. All of the nickel and palladium > samples >> showed gain. >> >> Jones > > >>> Neutrons escaping to a parallel world? > > >>> In a paper recently published in EPJ C¹, researchers hypothesised the >>> existence of mirror particles to explain the anomalous loss of >>> neutrons observed experimentally. The existence of such mirror matter >>> had been suggested in various scientific contexts some time ago, >>> including the search for suitable dark matter candidates. > > >>> http://phys.org/news/2012-06-neutrons-parallel-world.html >>> >> >> >> > > >
