Jojo, I am hoping for the best in your testing. I am also trying to build and test a system, but I am several steps behind you. May I ask, did you get successful results from your gen1 system, and can you share any details that may help in the tests I am conducting? I am only using Ni powder and Hydrogen combinations with temperature and pressure in the current tests.
Ron -----Original Message----- From: Jojo Jaro [mailto:jth...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 11:43 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:The SWNT rug part 1 My gen2 reactor is almost complete. I am missing 2 parts that I can not source here. It will have to wait until I get back to the States. I have built a small and cheap reactor to provide a "proof of concept" test. Reactor cost less than $100 to provide this proof of concept. If successful, I am having a full size "Fat-Cat" reactor built. My reactor does not require dielectric fluid. Density to fluid is irrelevant. No ultra-sound, but I do have a proprietary means of dispersing the nanoparticles. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: <pagnu...@htdconnect.com> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 1:55 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:The SWNT rug part 1 > Jojo, > > You have a huge parameter space to search. > > - What dielectric fluid will you suspend the nanoparticles in? > > - What density of particles-to-fluid? > > - Will you use ultra-sound to disperse the particles? > or, then let them form larger aggregates and colloidal chains? > > Also check that the particle density, and conductive pathways, allow the > electromagnetic pulses from the sparks to penetrate most of the volume > rather than just around the discharge. > > Lots of other parameters, too. > > Are you far enough along to share details? > > -- Lou Pagnucco > > Jojo Jaro wrote: >> Excellent post Axil. This was how I understood what you were saying from >> earliere posts, that is why I was harping on the significance of why >> Rossi >> changed to a Fat Cat design. To distribute sparking evenly. >> >> Another thing that I am speculating is that Rossi is using a CVD process >> first before his sparks. CVD can initiate the growth of SWNTs better and >> more evenly. He distributes his nickel evenly and then start the vapor >> deposition to start the growth. This would allow growth evenly on his >> flat reactor surface. Subsequent sparking completes the growth and >> allows >> for charge accumulation on the SWNTs now covering the nickel >> nanoparticles. Once the nickel nanoparticles are covered with SWNTs, >> sparking is the only thing left to initiate and control the reaction >> rate. >> >> I plan to test this hypothesis but have been hampered by parts >> availability where I'm at right now. >> >> >> Jojo >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Axil Axil >> To: vortex-l >> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 1:05 PM >> Subject: [Vo]:The SWNT rug part 1 >> >> >> The SWNT rug part 1 >> >> >> Fabrication of the ideal charge delivery nanostructure for LENR may be >> beyond the capabilities and limited resources of the lone Ni/H reactor >> developer. This may be why Rossi has greatly benefited from >> collaboration with advanced technology partners who can design and >> implement advanced SWNT structures that are optimized for LENR. >> >> >> >> >> To get the most out of LENR, charge must be evenly spread over the >> entire surface area of the nickel nanoparticles, as large as that area >> may be. >> >> >> >> >> >> Most publically available LENR mechanisms currently found in LENR >> research suffer from a poor distribution of nuclear active sites. The >> energy production of these areas is limited in number. Furthermore, the >> distribution of the nuclear active sites (NAS) is random and poorly >> placed. This all leads to a proportionately small productivity of the >> Ni/H reaction. But if properly configured, nanomaterial is a powerful >> multiplier of the LENR effect in inverse proportion to its >> dimensionality. >> >> >> >> >> >> For example, if you want to properly water a corn field to get optimum >> crop yield, we do not want to pump all the irrigation water into a big >> hole in a corner at the edge of the field and hope for the best. >> >> >> >> >> >> A water distribution system; a sprinkler or drip system must be >> engineered to get water to each corn plant at optimum levels. >> >> >> >> >> >> Like water dumped into a hole, A spark can only be delivered to a small >> volume of material in a localize area. The reaction, if any, will be >> limited by the restrictions of this localized charge distribution >> strategy. >> >> >> >> >> >> To increase the power of the LENR reaction, the number of NASs must be >> dramatically increased. >> >> >> >> >> >> The spark should be optimally partitioned and spread out over the >> widest >> area, in the same way that nano-particles multiply the surface area of >> its bulk material. So charge distribution and nanoparticle area should >> be properly mated through an optimal connection. >> >> >> >> >> >> If this relationship between charge presentation and the associated >> nanoparticle is optimize, a large amount of power can be produced by a >> small amount of Nano-powder. As improbable as Rossi's claim may now >> sound .those one and a half grams of Nano nickel powder can generate 10 >> kilowatts of power. This amazing claim may be possible if every nano >> particle grain is pressed into service in an optimal way. >> >> >> >> >> >> In my next post, I intend to reference a paper recently commissioned by >> the US Defense Department (DOD) to explain why a SWNT rug can get charge >> to nickel Nano powder is the best way. This explanation will act as a >> narrative for a specification of a charge distribution system for LENR. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers: Axil >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >
