Jed,
I happen to be at the Kitty Hawk, NC beach today so i am channeling your
thoughts. The only planes flying overhead today are pulling banners
selling Geico insurance.
You are obviously one of the better resources for all scientific documents
and history associated with anomalous heat. I suggest instead of
alienating Mark, which you have obviously already done, you engage in some
meaningful discussion with him. To me he at least seemed open to
discussions and his last article was better than his first couple.
Also, there are not thousands of reporters writing about cold fusion.
Mostly a few bloggers. Very few even covered Martin's passing, which is
sad. Hopefully in the near future there will be lots to write about, maybe
not.
I have been following for a year and half but it is still very confusing to
me what the repeatable results are. To me the anomalous heat could include
anything from nanomagnetism, LENR, CANR, ZPE, vacuum energy, Hawking
Radiation (my theory), hydrinos, fusion, beta decays to aliens farting
through a wormhole.
I do not expect you to listen to me but I know you will read it as I am
your conservative concience.
On Monday, August 6, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'mgi...@gibbs.com');>> wrote:
>
> I rest my case.
>
>
> That is a snide, content-free response. I suggest you un-rest your case. I
> suggest you do your homework. Learn about cold fusion before writing about
> it. You article reminds me of the sort of thing some reporters wrote about
> the Wright brothers in 1904. The described the airplane as a sort of
> balloon with a kite attached to it. Your reports are not merely inaccurate;
> they are a fantasy. They bear no resemblance to what the researchers claim
> in the peer-reviewed literature.
>
> You do your readers a disservice with this kind of sloppy reporting. You
> should be ashamed of yourself. If you are going to participate here, I
> think you should stop writing snide retorts and instead address the
> technical issues. This is a science forum, not a place to accuse people of
> believing in conspiracy theories.
>
> For the record, I do not believe in conspiracy theories and I do not know
> any researchers who do.
>
> Please note the title of this thread is ". . . annoying." I am annoyed.
> Not particularly angry. With all the rain we have been getting in Atlanta
> lately, we have a lot of mosquitoes. I swat them when I can. They annoy me.
> They do not anger me. There are millions of them; way too many to get angry
> at each individual. There are thousands of ignorant, lazy, blood-sucking,
> two-bit reporters writing nonsense about cold fusion. Way too many to swat,
> or get angry at.
>
> - Jed
>
>
